
Recherche avancée
Médias (1)
-
La conservation du net art au musée. Les stratégies à l’œuvre
26 mai 2011
Mis à jour : Juillet 2013
Langue : français
Type : Texte
Autres articles (41)
-
Websites made with MediaSPIP
2 mai 2011, parThis page lists some websites based on MediaSPIP.
-
Keeping control of your media in your hands
13 avril 2011, parThe vocabulary used on this site and around MediaSPIP in general, aims to avoid reference to Web 2.0 and the companies that profit from media-sharing.
While using MediaSPIP, you are invited to avoid using words like "Brand", "Cloud" and "Market".
MediaSPIP is designed to facilitate the sharing of creative media online, while allowing authors to retain complete control of their work.
MediaSPIP aims to be accessible to as many people as possible and development is based on expanding the (...) -
Creating farms of unique websites
13 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP platforms can be installed as a farm, with a single "core" hosted on a dedicated server and used by multiple websites.
This allows (among other things) : implementation costs to be shared between several different projects / individuals rapid deployment of multiple unique sites creation of groups of like-minded sites, making it possible to browse media in a more controlled and selective environment than the major "open" (...)
Sur d’autres sites (5857)
-
Google’s YouTube Uses FFmpeg
9 février 2011, par Multimedia Mike — GeneralControversy arose last week when Google accused Microsoft of stealing search engine results for their Bing search engine. It was a pretty novel sting operation and Google did a good job of visually illustrating their side of the story on their official blog.
This reminds me of the fact that Google’s YouTube video hosting site uses FFmpeg for converting videos. Not that this is in the same league as the search engine shenanigans (it’s perfectly legit to use FFmpeg in this capacity, but to my knowledge, Google/YouTube has never confirmed FFmpeg usage), but I thought I would revisit this item and illustrate it with screenshots. This is not new information— I first empirically tested this fact 4 years ago. However, a lot of people wonder how exactly I can identify FFmpeg on the backend when I claim that I’ve written code that helps power YouTube.
Short Answer
How do I know YouTube uses FFmpeg to convert multimedia ? Because :- FFmpeg can decode a number of impossibly obscure multimedia formats using code I wrote
- YouTube can transcode many of the same formats
- I screwed up when I wrote the code to support some of these weird formats
- My mistakes are still present when YouTube transcodes certain fringe formats
Longer Answer (With Pictures !)
Let’s take a video format named RoQ, developed by noted game designer Graeme Devine. Originated for use in the FMV-heavy game The 11th Hour, the format eventually found its way into the Quake 3 engine as well as many games derived from the same technology.Dr. Tim Ferguson reverse engineered the format (though it would later be open sourced along with the rest of the Q3 engine). I wrote a RoQ playback system for FFmpeg, and I messed up in doing so. I believe my coding error helps demonstrate the case I’m trying to make here.
Observe what happened when I pushed the jk02.roq sample through YouTube in my original experiment 4 years ago :
Do you see how the canyon walls bleed into the sky ? That’s not supposed to happen. FFmpeg doesn’t do that anymore but I was able to go back into the source code history to find when it did do that :
Academic Answer
FFmpeg fixed this bug in June of 2007 (thanks to Eric Lasota). The problem had to do with premature colorspace conversion in my original decoder.Leftovers
I tried uploading the video again to see if the problem persists in YouTube’s transcoder. First bit of trivia : YouTube detects when you have uploaded the same video twice and rejects the subsequent attempts. So I created a double concatenation of the video and uploaded it. The problem is gone, illustrating that the backend is actually using a newer version of FFmpeg. This surprises me for somewhat esoteric reasons.Here’s another interesting bit of trivia for those who don’t do a lot of YouTube uploading— YouTube reports format details when you upload a video :
So, yep, RoQ format. And you can wager that this will prompt me to go back through the litany of unusual formats that FFmpeg supports to see how YouTube responds.
-
Announcing Dreamroq
20 mars 2011, par Multimedia Mike — Sega DreamcastI have pushed the first public version of my new Dreamroq (we open source types are just so creative in our naming schemes) library up to Github :
https://github.com/multimediamike/dreamroq
To review, this is a library for playing RoQ video files on the Sega Dreamcast. It has a lot of problems right now, many of which are listed in the README file. It comes with a Dreamcast/KOS sample player. It also comes with a simple Unix testing utility which decodes a file to a series of PNM files. If anyone is interested in debugging RoQ again after all these years that it has been supported in other open source programs, there is still a bug in the video decoder that produces some notable artifacts.
Also, here are some samples I generated that appear to meet the data rate requirements laid out in this post. These samples are based on this sample media set from Xiph.org.
-
Debian killing ffmpeg
3 juillet 2017, par Viktor JorasIt must be some kind of Linux update because all of a sudden, after years of ffmpeg usage with Debian, ffmpeg gets killed without a logic reason. The funny part is there is no trace of killings in log files inside /var/log. Nothing !
The killings are more or less random, sometimes it happens after 1 second, other times after 50 seconds.
While transcoding ffmpegs outputs "
Killed
" and after few rows it outputs "Exiting normally, received signal 15
".The same behaviour happens with 4 different machines with Debian, kernel 3.16 and 4.9 with a lot of RAM, so memory is not the issue.
Is there a kind of setting that limits CPU or some other devilry that is ruining my happiness ?