Recherche avancée

Médias (91)

Autres articles (52)

  • Configurer la prise en compte des langues

    15 novembre 2010, par

    Accéder à la configuration et ajouter des langues prises en compte
    Afin de configurer la prise en compte de nouvelles langues, il est nécessaire de se rendre dans la partie "Administrer" du site.
    De là, dans le menu de navigation, vous pouvez accéder à une partie "Gestion des langues" permettant d’activer la prise en compte de nouvelles langues.
    Chaque nouvelle langue ajoutée reste désactivable tant qu’aucun objet n’est créé dans cette langue. Dans ce cas, elle devient grisée dans la configuration et (...)

  • MediaSPIP 0.1 Beta version

    25 avril 2011, par

    MediaSPIP 0.1 beta is the first version of MediaSPIP proclaimed as "usable".
    The zip file provided here only contains the sources of MediaSPIP in its standalone version.
    To get a working installation, you must manually install all-software dependencies on the server.
    If you want to use this archive for an installation in "farm mode", you will also need to proceed to other manual (...)

  • Submit bugs and patches

    13 avril 2011

    Unfortunately a software is never perfect.
    If you think you have found a bug, report it using our ticket system. Please to help us to fix it by providing the following information : the browser you are using, including the exact version as precise an explanation as possible of the problem if possible, the steps taken resulting in the problem a link to the site / page in question
    If you think you have solved the bug, fill in a ticket and attach to it a corrective patch.
    You may also (...)

Sur d’autres sites (4469)

  • Why review compositing work in MJPEG videos rather than (say) H.264 ?

    6 juin 2016, par d3vid

    I have received a request to encode DPX files to MOV/MJPEG rather than MOV/H.264 (which ffmpeg picks by default if you convert to output.mov). These is to review compositing renders (in motion), so color accuracy is critical.

    Comparing a sample "ideal" MOV to the current (H.264) output I can see :

    • resolution : the same
    • ColorSpace/Primaries : Rec609 (SD) versus Rec709 (HD)
    • YUV : 4:2:0 versus 4:4:4
    • filesize : smaller

    The ffmpeg default seems to be better quality and result in a smaller filesize. Is there something I’m missing ?

  • Normalise offsetX and offsetY on the event

    19 février 2014, par chriscbrock
    Normalise offsetX and offsetY on the event

    According to the W3C Working Draft, offsetX and offsetY should be
    
relative to the padding edge of the target element. The only browser
    
using this convention is IE. Webkit uses the border edge, Opera uses the
    
content edge, and FireFox does not support the properties.
    

    Normalizing to the border edge is easiest to do.

  • Normalise offsetX and offsetY on the event

    19 février 2014, par chriscbrock
    Normalise offsetX and offsetY on the event

    According to the W3C Working Draft, offsetX and offsetY should be
    
relative to the padding edge of the target element. The only browser
    
using this convention is IE. Webkit uses the border edge, Opera uses the
    
content edge, and FireFox does not support the properties.
    

    Normalizing to the border edge is easiest to do.

Navigation