Recherche avancée

Médias (1)

Mot : - Tags -/MediaSPIP 0.2

Autres articles (79)

  • Organiser par catégorie

    17 mai 2013, par

    Dans MédiaSPIP, une rubrique a 2 noms : catégorie et rubrique.
    Les différents documents stockés dans MédiaSPIP peuvent être rangés dans différentes catégories. On peut créer une catégorie en cliquant sur "publier une catégorie" dans le menu publier en haut à droite ( après authentification ). Une catégorie peut être rangée dans une autre catégorie aussi ce qui fait qu’on peut construire une arborescence de catégories.
    Lors de la publication prochaine d’un document, la nouvelle catégorie créée sera proposée (...)

  • Récupération d’informations sur le site maître à l’installation d’une instance

    26 novembre 2010, par

    Utilité
    Sur le site principal, une instance de mutualisation est définie par plusieurs choses : Les données dans la table spip_mutus ; Son logo ; Son auteur principal (id_admin dans la table spip_mutus correspondant à un id_auteur de la table spip_auteurs)qui sera le seul à pouvoir créer définitivement l’instance de mutualisation ;
    Il peut donc être tout à fait judicieux de vouloir récupérer certaines de ces informations afin de compléter l’installation d’une instance pour, par exemple : récupérer le (...)

  • Demande de création d’un canal

    12 mars 2010, par

    En fonction de la configuration de la plateforme, l’utilisateur peu avoir à sa disposition deux méthodes différentes de demande de création de canal. La première est au moment de son inscription, la seconde, après son inscription en remplissant un formulaire de demande.
    Les deux manières demandent les mêmes choses fonctionnent à peu près de la même manière, le futur utilisateur doit remplir une série de champ de formulaire permettant tout d’abord aux administrateurs d’avoir des informations quant à (...)

Sur d’autres sites (3859)

  • Google Analytics Now Illegal in Austria ; Other EU Member States Expected to Follow

    18 janvier 2022, par Erin — Privacy

    Breaking news : The Austrian Data Protection Authority (“Datenschutzbehörde” or “DSB” or “DPA”) has ruled that Austrian website providers using Google Analytics are in violation of the GDPR. 

    This ruling stems from a decision made in 2020 by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) that stated that cloud services hosted in the US are incapable of complying with the GDPR and EU privacy laws. The decision was made because of the US surveillance laws requiring US providers (like Google or Facebook) to provide personal data to US authorities. 

    The 2020 ruling, known as “Schrems II”, marked the ending of the Privacy Shield, a framework that allowed for EU data to be transferred to US companies that became certified. 

    The tech industry was sent into a frenzy following this decision, but many US and EU companies decided to ignore the case. The choice to ignore is what landed one Austrian business in the DPA’s line of fire, damaging the brand’s reputation and possibly resulting in a hefty fine of up to €20 million or 4% of the organisation’s global turnover. 

    About the Austrian DPA’s Model Case 

    In this specific case, noyb (the European Center for Digital Rights) found that IP addresses (which are classified as personal data by the GDPR) and other identifiers were sent to the US in cookie data as a result of the organisation using Google Analytics. 

    This model case led to the DPA’s decision to rule that Austrian website providers using Google Analytics are in violation of GDPR. It is believed that other EU Member States will soon follow in this decision as well.

    "We expect similar decisions to now drop gradually in most EU member states. We have filed 101 complaints in almost all Member States and the authorities coordinated the response. A similar decision was also issued by the European Data Protection Supervisor last week."

    Max Schrems, honorary chair of noyb.eu

    What does this mean if you are using Google Analytics ?

    If there is one thing to learn from this case, it is that ignoring these court rulings and continuing to use Google Analytics is not a viable option. 

    If you are operating a website in Austria, or your website services Austrian citizens, you should remove Google Analytics from your website immediately. 

    For businesses in other EU Member States, it is also highly recommended that you take action before noyb and local data protection authorities start targeting more businesses. 

    "Instead of actually adapting services to be GDPR compliant, US companies have tried to simply add some text to their privacy policies and ignore the Court of Justice. Many EU companies have followed the lead instead of switching to legal options."

    Max Schrems

    Removing Google Analytics from your site doesn’t mean that you need to give up website analytics altogether though. There are a variety of Google Analytics alternatives available today. Matomo in particular is a powerful open-source web analytics platform that gives you 100% data ownership and GDPR compliance

    Tweet - Using Google Analytics is illegal in Europe
    Glenn F. Henriksen via Twitter

    Matomo is one of the best Google Analytics alternatives offering privacy by design on our Cloud, On-Premise and Matomo for WordPress. So you can get the insights you need while remaining compliant. As the GDPR continues to evolve, you can rest assured that Matomo will be at the forefront of these changes. 

    In addition, all Google Analytics data can be imported into Matomo so no historical data is lost. To make your migration as seamless as possible, we’ve put together a guide to migrating from Google Analytics to Matomo

    Ready to begin your journey to GDPR compliance ? Check out our live demo and start your 21-day free trial now – no credit card required.

    If you are interested in learning more about GDPR compliance and Matomo, check out our GDPR resources below :    

    What does this mean if you are using Matomo ? 

    Our users can rest assured that Matomo remains in compliance with GDPR as all data is stored in the EU (Matomo Cloud) or in any country of your choice (Matomo On-Premise). With Matomo you’re able to continue analysing your website and not worry about GDPR.

    Final thoughts

    For EU businesses operating websites, now is the time to act. While Google pushes out false narratives to try and convince users that it is safe to continue using Google Analytics, it’s clear from these court rulings that the data protection authorities across the EU disagree with Google’s narrative.

    The fines, reputational damage and stresses mounting from using Google Analytics are imminent. Find an alternative to Google Analytics as this problem is not going away. 

    Getting started with Matomo is easy. Make the switch today and start your free 21-day trial – no credit card required. 

  • Google Analytics 4 and GDPR : Everything You Need to Know

    17 mai 2022, par Erin

    Four years have passed since the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR, also known as DSGVO in German, and RGPD in French) took effect.

    That’s ample time to get compliant, especially for an organisation as big and innovative as Google. Or is it ? 

    If you are wondering how GDPR affects Google Analytics 4 and what the compliance status is at present, here’s the lowdown. 

    Is Google Analytics 4 GDPR Compliant ?

    No. As of mid-2022, Google Analytics 4 (GA4) isn’t fully GDPR compliant. Despite adding extra privacy-focused features, GA4 still has murky status with the European regulators. After the invalidation of the Privacy Shield framework in 2020, Google is yet to regulate EU-US data protection. At present, the company doesn’t sufficiently protect EU citizens’ and residents’ data against US surveillance laws. This is a direct breach of GDPR.

    Google Analytics and GDPR : a Complex Relationship 

    European regulators have scrutinised Google since GDPR came into effect in 2018.

    While the company took steps to prepare for GDPR provisions, it didn’t fully comply with important regulations around user data storage, transfer and security.

    The relationship between Google and EU regulators got more heated after the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) invalidated the Privacy Shield — a leeway Google used for EU-US data transfers. After 2020, GDPR litigation against Google followed. 

    This post summarises the main milestones in this story and explains the consequences for Google Analytics users. 

    Google Analytics and GDPR Timeline

    2018 : Google Analytics Meets GDPR 

    In 2018, the EU adopted the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) — a set of privacy and data security laws, covering all member states. Every business interacting with EU citizens and/or residents had to comply.

    GDPR harmonised data protection laws across member states and put down extra provisions for what constitutes sensitive personal information (or PII). Broadly, PII includes any data about the person’s :

    • Racial or ethnic origin 
    • Employment status 
    • Religious or political beliefs
    • State of health 
    • Genetic or biometric data 
    • Financial records (such as payment method data)
    • Address and phone numbers 

    Businesses were barred from collecting this information without explicit consent (and even with it in some cases). If collected, such sensitive information is also subject to strict requirements on how it should be stored, secured, transferred and used. 

    7 Main GDPR Principles Explained 

    Article 5 of the GDPR lays out seven main GDPR principles for personal data and privacy protection : 

    • Lawfulness, fairness and transparency — data must be obtained legally, collected with consent and in adherence to laws. 
    • Purpose limitation — all personal information must be collected for specified, explicit and legal purposes. 
    • Data minimisation — companies must collect only necessary and adequate data, aligned with the stated purpose. 
    • Accuracy — data accuracy must be ensured at all times. Companies must have mechanisms to erase or correct inaccurate data without delays. 
    • Storage limitation — data must be stored only for as long as the stated purpose suggests. Though there’s no upper time limit on data storage. 
    • Integrity and confidentiality (security) — companies must take measures to ensure secure data storage and prevent unlawful or unauthorised access to it. 
    • Accountability — companies must be able to demonstrate adherence to the above principles. 

    Google claimed to have taken steps to make all of their products GDPR compliant ahead of the deadline. But in practice, this wasn’t always the case.

    In March 2018, a group of publishers admonished Google for not providing them with enough tools for GDPR compliance :

    “[Y]ou refuse to provide publishers with any specific information about how you will collect, share and use the data. Placing the full burden of obtaining new consent on the publisher is untenable without providing the publisher with the specific information needed to provide sufficient transparency or to obtain the requisite specific, granular and informed consent under the GDPR.”

    The proposed Google Analytics GDPR consent form was hard to implement and lacked customisation options. In fact, Google “makes unilateral decisions” on how the collected data is stored and used. 

    Users had no way to learn about or control all intended uses of people’s data — which made compliance with the second clause impossible. 

    Unsurprisingly, Google was among the first companies to face a GDPR lawsuit (together with Facebook). 

    By 2019, French data regulator CNIL, successfully argued that Google wasn’t sufficiently disclosing its data collection across products — and hence in breach of GDPR. After a failed appeal, Google had to pay a €50 million fine and promise to do better. 

    2019 : Google Analytics 4 Announcement 

    Throughout 2019, Google rightfully attempted to resolve some of its GDPR shortcomings across all products, Google Universal Analytics (UA) included. 

    They added a more visible consent mechanism for online tracking and provided extra compliance tips for users to follow. In the background, Google also made tech changes to its data processing mechanism to get on the good side of regulations.

    Though Google addressed some of the issues, they missed others. A 2019 independent investigation found that Google real-time-bidding (RTB) ad auctions still used EU citizens’ and residents’ data without consent, thanks to a loophole called “Push Pages”. But they managed to quickly patch this up before the allegations had made it to court. 

    In November 2019, Google released a beta version of the new product version — Google Analytics 4, due to replace Universal Analytics. 

    GA4 came with a set of new privacy-focused features for ticking GDPR boxes such as :

    • Data deletion mechanism. Users can now request to surgically extract certain data from the Analytics servers via a new interface. 
    • Shorter data retention period. You can now shorten the default retention period to 2 months by default (instead of 14 months) or add a custom limit.  
    • IP Anonymisation. GA4 doesn’t log or store IP addresses by default. 

    Google Analytics also updated its data processing terms and made changes to its privacy policy

    Though Google made some progress, Google Analytics 4 still has many limitations — and isn’t GDPR compliant. 

    2020 : Privacy Shield Invalidation Ruling 

    As part of the 2018 GDPR preparations, Google named its Irish entity (Google Ireland Limited) as the “data controller” legally responsible for EEA and Swiss users’ information. 

    The company announcement says : 

    Google Analytics Statement on Privacy Shield Invalidation Ruling
    Source : Google

    Initially, Google assumed that this legal change would help them ensure GDPR compliance as “legally speaking” a European entity was set in charge of European data. 

    Practically, however, EEA consumers’ data was still primarily transferred and processed in the US — where most Google data centres are located. Until 2020, such cross-border data transfers were considered legal thanks to the Privacy Shield framework

    But in July 2020, The EU Court of Justice ruled that this framework doesn’t provide adequate data protection to digitally transmitted data against US surveillance laws. Hence, companies like Google can no longer use it. The Swiss Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner (FDPIC) reached the same conclusion in September 2020. 

    The invalidation of the Privacy Shield framework put Google in a tough position.

     Article 14. f of the GDPR explicitly states : 

    “The controller (the company) that intends to carry out a transfer of personal data to a recipient (Analytics solution) in a third country or an international organisation must provide its users with information on the place of processing and storage of its data”.

    Invalidation of the Privacy Shield framework prohibited Google from moving data to the US. At the same time, GDPR provisions mandated that they must disclose proper data location. 

    But Google Analytics (like many other products) had no a mechanism for : 

    • Guaranteeing intra-EU data storage 
    • Selecting a designated regional storage location 
    • Informing users about data storage location or data transfers outside of the EU 

    And these factors made Google Analytics in direct breach of GDPR — a territory, where they remain as of 2022.

    2020-2022 : Google GDPR Breaches and Fines 

    The 2020 ruling opened Google to GDPR lawsuits from country-specific data regulators.

    Google Analytics in particular was under a heavy cease-fire. 

    • Sweden first fined Google for violating GDPR for no not fulfilling its obligations to request data delisting in 2020. 
    • France rejected Google Analytics 4 IP address anonymisation function as a sufficient measure for protecting cross-border data transfers. Even with it, US intelligence services can still access user IPs and other PII. France declared Google Analytics illegal and pressed a €150 million fine. 
    • Austria also found Google Analytics GDPR non-compliant and proclaimed the service as “illegal”. The authority now seeks a fine too. 

    The Dutch Data Protection Authority and  Norwegian Data Protection Authority also found Google Analytics guilty of a GDPR breach and seek to limit Google Analytics usage. 

    New privacy controls in Google Analytics 4 do not resolve the underlying issue — unregulated, non-consensual EU-US data transfer. 

    Google Analytics GDPR non-compliance effectively opens any website tracking or analysing European visitors to legal persecution.

    In fact, this is already happening. noyb, a European privacy-focused NGO, has already filed over 100 lawsuits against European websites using Google Analytics.

    2022 : Privacy Shield 2.0. Negotiations

    Google isn’t the only US company affected by the Privacy Shield framework invalidation. The ruling puts thousands of digital companies at risk of non-compliance.

    To settle the matter, US and EU authorities started “peace talks” in spring 2022.

    European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said that they are working with the Biden administration on the new agreement that will “enable predictable and trustworthy data flows between the EU and US, safeguarding the privacy and civil liberties.” 

    However, it’s just the beginning of a lengthy negotiation process. The matter is far from being settled and contentious issues remain as we discussed on Twitter (come say hi !).

    For one, the US isn’t eager to modify its surveillance laws and is mostly willing to make them “proportional” to those in place in the EU. These modifications may still not satisfy CJEU — which has the power to block the agreement vetting or invalidate it once again. 

    While these matters are getting hashed out, Google Analytics users, collecting data about EU citizens and/or residents, remain on slippery grounds. As long as they use GA4, they can be subject to GDPR-related lawsuits. 

    To Sum It Up 

    • Google Analytics 4 and Google Universal Analytics are not GDPR compliant because of Privacy Shield invalidation in 2020. 
    • French and Austrian data watchdogs named Google Analytics operations “illegal”. Swedish, Dutch and Norwegian authorities also claim it’s in breach of GDPR. 
    • Any website using GA for collecting data about European citizens and/or residents can be taken to court for GDPR violations (which is already happening). 
    • Privacy Shield 2.0 Framework discussions to regulate EU-US data transfers have only begun and may take years. Even if accepted, the new framework(s) may once again be invalidated by local data regulators as has already happened in the past. 

    Time to Get a GDPR Compliant Google Analytics Alternative 

    Retaining 100% data ownership is the optimal path to GDPR compliance.

    By selecting a transparent web analytics solution that offers 100% data ownership, you can rest assured that no “behind the scenes” data collection, processing or transfers take place. 

    Unlike Google Analytics 4, Matomo offers all of the features you need to be GDPR compliant : 

    • Full data anonymisation 
    • Single-purpose data usage 
    • Easy consent and an opt-out mechanism 
    • First-party cookies usage by default 
    • Simple access to collect data 
    • Fast data removals 
    • EU-based data storage for Matomo Cloud (or storage in the country of your choice with Matomo On-Premise)

    Learn about your audiences in a privacy-centred way and protect your business against unnecessary legal exposure. 

    Start your 21-day free trial (no credit card required) to see how fully GDPR-compliant website analytics works ! 

  • avcodec/gdv : Combine first and 3rd case in rescale()

    5 août 2018, par Michael Niedermayer
    avcodec/gdv : Combine first and 3rd case in rescale()
    

    Simplifies code

    Signed-off-by : Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>

    • [DH] libavcodec/gdv.c