Recherche avancée

Sur d’autres sites (8389)

• How to contribute to open source, for companies

  18 octobre 2010, par Dark Shikari — development, open source, x264

  I have seen many nigh-incomprehensible attempts by companies to contribute to open source projects, including x264. Developers are often simply boggled, wondering why the companies seem incapable of proper communication. The companies assume the developers are being unreceptive, while the developers assume the companies are being incompetent, idiotic, or malicious. Most of this seems to boil down to a basic lack of understanding of how open source works, resulting in a wide variety of misunderstandings. Accordingly, this post will cover the dos and don’ts of corporate contribution to open source.

  Do : contact the project using their preferred medium of communication.

  Most open source projects use public methods of communication, such as mailing lists and IRC. It’s not the end of the world if you mistakenly make contact with the wrong people or via the wrong medium, but be prepared to switch to the correct one once informed ! You may not be experienced using whatever form of communication the project uses, but if you refuse to communicate through proper channels, they will likely not be as inclined to assist you. Larger open source projects are often much like companies in that they have different parts to their organization with different roles. Don’t assume that everyone is a major developer !

  If you don’t know what to do, a good bet is often to just ask someone.

  Don’t : contact only one person.

  Open source projects are a communal effort. Major contributions are looked over by multiple developers and are often discussed by the community as a whole. Yet many companies tend to contact only a single person in lieu of dealing with the project proper. This has many flaws : to begin with, it forces a single developer (who isn’t paid by you) to act as your liaison, adding yet another layer between what you want and the people you want to talk to. Contribution to open source projects should not be a game of telephone.

  Of course, there are exceptions to this : sometimes a single developer is in charge of the entirety of some particular aspect of a project that you intend to contribute to, in which case this might not be so bad.

  Do : make clear exactly what it is you are contributing.

  Are you contributing code ? Development resources ? Money ? API documentation ? Make it as clear as possible, from the start ! How developers react, which developers get involved, and their expectations will depend heavily on what they think you are providing. Make sure their expectations match reality. Great confusion can result when they do not.

  This also applies in the reverse — if there’s something you need from the project, such as support or assistance with development of your patch, make that explicitly clear.

  Don’t : code dump.

  Code does not have intrinsic value : it is only useful as part of a working, living project. Most projects react very negatively to large “dumps” of code without associated human resources. That is, they expect you to work with them to finalize the code until it is ready to be committed. Of course, it’s better to work with the project from the start : this avoids the situation of writing 50,000 lines of code independently and then finding that half of it needs to be rewritten. Or, worse, writing an enormous amount of code only to find it completely unnecessary.

  Of course, the reverse option — keeping such code to yourself — is often even more costly, as it forces you to maintain the code instead of the official developers.

  Do : ignore trolls.

  As mentioned above, many projects use public communication methods — which, of course, allow anyone to communicate, by nature of being public. Not everyone on a project’s IRC or mailing list is necessarily qualified to officially represent the project. It is not too uncommon for a prospective corporate contributor to be turned off by the uninviting words of someone who isn’t even involved in the project due to assuming that they were. Make sure you’re dealing with the right people before making conclusions.

  Don’t : disappear.

  If you are going to try to be involved in a project, you need to stay in contact. We’ve had all too many companies who simply disappear after the initial introduction. Some tell us that we’ll need an NDA, then never provide it or send status updates. You may know why you’re not in contact — political issues at the company, product launch crunches, a nice vacation to the Bahamas — but we don’t ! If you disappear, we will assume that you gave up.

  Above all, don’t assume that being at a large successful company makes you immune to these problems. If anything, these problems seem to be the most common at the largest companies. I didn’t name any names in this post, but practically every single one of these rules has been violated at some point by companies looking to contribute to x264. In the larger scale of open source, these problems happen constantly. Don’t fall into the same traps that many other companies have.

  If you’re an open source developer reading this post, remember it next time you see a company acting seemingly nonsensically in an attempt to contribute : it’s quite possible they just don’t know what to do. And just because they’re doing it wrong doesn’t mean that it isn’t your responsibility to try to help them do it right.

• 2011 In Open Source Multimedia

  5 janvier 2012, par Multimedia Mike — Open Source Multimedia

  Sometimes I think that the pace of multimedia technology is slowing down. Obviously, I’m not paying close enough attention. I thought I would do a little 2011 year-end review of what happened in the world of open source multimedia, mainly for my own benefit. Let me know in the comments what I missed.

  The Split
  The biggest deal in open source multimedia was the matter of the project split. Where once stood one project (FFmpeg) there now stands two (also Libav). Where do things stand with the projects now ? Still very separate but similar. Both projects obsessively monitor each other’s git commits and prodigiously poach each other’s work, both projects being LGPL and all. Most features that land in one code base end up in the other. Thus, I refer to FFmpeg and Libav collectively as “the projects”.

  Some philosophical reasons for the split included project stagnation and development process friction. Curiously, these problems are fond memories now and the spirit of competition has pushed development forward at a blinding pace.

  People inside the project have strong opinions about the split ; that’s understandable. People outside the project have strong opinions about the split ; that’s somewhat less understandable, but whatever. After 5 years of working for Adobe on the Flash Player (a.k.a. the most hated software in all existence if internet nerds are to be believed on the matter), I’m so over internet nerd drama.

  For my part, I just try to maintain some appearance of neutrality since I manage some shared resources for the open source multimedia community (like the wiki and samples repo) and am trying to keep them from fracturing as well.

  Apple and Open Source
  It was big news that Apple magnanimously open sourced their lossless audio codec. That sets a great example and precedent.

  New Features
  I mined the 'git log' of the projects in order to pick out some features that were added during 2011.

  First off, Apple’s ProRes video codec was reverse engineered and incorporated into the multimedia libraries. And for some weird reason, this is an item that made the rounds in the geek press. I’m not entirely sure why, but it may have something to do with inter-project conflict. Anyway, here is the decoder in action, playing a video of some wild swine, one of the few samples we have :

  
  
  

  Other new video codecs included a reverse engineered Indeo 4 decoder. Gotta catch ‘em all ! That completes our collection of Indeo codecs. But that wasn’t enough– this year, we got a completely revised Indeo 3 decoder (the previous one, while functional, exhibited a lot of code artifacts betraying a direct ASM ->C translation). Oh, and many thanks to Kostya for this gem :

  
  
  

  That’s the new Origin Xan decoder (best known for Wing Commander IV cinematics) in action, something I first started reverse engineering back in 2002. Thanks to Kostya for picking up my slack yet again.

  Continuing with the codec section, there is a decoder for Adobe Flash Screen Video 2 — big congrats on this ! One of my jobs at Adobe was documenting this format to the outside world and I was afraid I could never quite make it clear enough to build a complete re-implementation. But the team came through.

  Let’s see, there are decoders for VBLE video, Ut Video, Windows Media Image (WMVP/WMP2), Bink audio version ‘b’, H.264 4:2:2 intra frames, and MxPEG video. There is a DPX image encoder, a Cirrus Logic AccuPak video encoder, and a v410 codec.

  How about some more game stuff ? The projects saw — at long last — an SMJPEG demuxer. This will finally allow usage and testing of the SMJPEG IMA ADPCM audio decoder I added about a decade ago. Funny story behind that– I was porting all of my decoders from xine which included the SMJPEG ADPCM. I just never quite got around to writing a corresponding demuxer. Thanks to Paul Mahol for taking care of that.

  Here’s a DFA playback system for a 1995 DOS CD-ROM title called Chronomaster. No format is too obscure, nor its encoded contents too cheesy :

  
  
  

  There’s now a demuxer for a format called XMV that was (is ?) prevalent on Xbox titles. Now the projects can handle FMV files from many Xbox games, such as Thrillville.

  
  
  

  The projects also gained the ability to play BMV files. I think this surfing wizard comes from Discworld II. It’s non-computer-generated animation at a strange resolution.

  
  
  

  More demuxers : xWMA, PlayStation Portable PMP format, and CRI ADX format ; muxer for OpenMG audio and LATM muxer/demuxer.

  One more thing : an AVX-optimized fast Fourier transform (FFT). If you have a machine that supports AVX, there’s no way you’ll even notice the speed increase of a few measly FFT calls for audio coding/decoding, but that’s hardly the point. The projects always use everything on offer for any CPU.

  Please make me aware of features that I missed in the list !

  Continuous Testing
  As a result of the split, each project has its own FATE server, one for FFmpeg and one for Libav. As of the new year, FFmpeg has just over 1000 tests while Libav had 965. This is one area where I’m obviously ecstatic to see competition. Some ad-hoc measurements on my part indicate that the total code coverage via the FATEs has not appreciably increased. But that’s a total percentage. Both the test count and the code count have been steadily rising.

  Google Summer of Code and Google Code-In
  Once again, the projects were allowed to participate in the Google Summer of Code as well as Google Code-In. I confess that I didn’t keep up with these too carefully (and Code-In is still in progress as of this writing). I do know that the project split occurred after FFmpeg had already been accepted for GSoC season 2011 and the admins were gracious enough to allow FFmpeg and Libav to allow both projects to participate in the same slot as long as they could both be mature about it.

  Happy New Year
  Let’s see what we can accomplish in 2012.

• Convert series of images to video

  13 mai 2013, par user1055153

  I have series of images with sorted names, like 0000000354 ... 0000008591
  I have tried using ffmpeg or MEncoder to convert theme. In ffmpeg the problem is this that it will operate while the names are like 0000000001 ... 00000000009 with %010d syntax.I don't know what syntax i should use for my images names.in mencoder it will cover all images But when i play the output video it doesn't show images,I want to show every image in 5 seconds or somthing like this, any one can help ?