
Recherche avancée
Médias (1)
-
Bug de détection d’ogg
22 mars 2013, par
Mis à jour : Avril 2013
Langue : français
Type : Video
Autres articles (68)
-
Websites made with MediaSPIP
2 mai 2011, parThis page lists some websites based on MediaSPIP.
-
Gestion générale des documents
13 mai 2011, parMédiaSPIP ne modifie jamais le document original mis en ligne.
Pour chaque document mis en ligne il effectue deux opérations successives : la création d’une version supplémentaire qui peut être facilement consultée en ligne tout en laissant l’original téléchargeable dans le cas où le document original ne peut être lu dans un navigateur Internet ; la récupération des métadonnées du document original pour illustrer textuellement le fichier ;
Les tableaux ci-dessous expliquent ce que peut faire MédiaSPIP (...) -
Creating farms of unique websites
13 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP platforms can be installed as a farm, with a single "core" hosted on a dedicated server and used by multiple websites.
This allows (among other things) : implementation costs to be shared between several different projects / individuals rapid deployment of multiple unique sites creation of groups of like-minded sites, making it possible to browse media in a more controlled and selective environment than the major "open" (...)
Sur d’autres sites (6573)
-
Why won't some MP4 videos start streaming until the entire file is downloaded ?
28 janvier 2016, par SujeetI’m working on an application where users upload a video and play it back the browser using jwplayer, jplayer, flowplayer, etc. Some videos play immediately, while others wait until the entire video file has been downloaded.
I’m using ffmpeg to convert the video to mp4 format.
Here is some detailed information about one of the video files I tried.
General
Complete name : 429183132058337290450_AutoFF.mp4
Format : MPEG-4
Format profile : Base Media
Codec ID : isom
File size : 10.2 MiB
Duration : 24s 333ms
Overall bit rate : 3 501 Kbps
Video
ID : 1
Format : AVC
Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec
Format profile : High@L4.1
Format settings, CABAC : Yes
Format settings, ReFrames : 3 frames
Codec ID : avc1
Codec ID/Info : Advanced Video Coding
Duration : 24s 333ms
Bit rate mode : Variable
Bit rate : 3 351 Kbps
Width : 1 024 pixels
Height : 560 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 16:9
Frame rate mode : Constant
Frame rate : 30.000 fps
Color space : YUV
Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
Bit depth : 8 bits
Scan type : Progressive
Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.195
Stream size : 9.72 MiB (96%)
Language : Japanese -
Post processing in ffmpeg to move 'moov atom' in MP4 files (qt-faststart)
12 septembre 2014, par siliconpiIs it possible to run ffmpeg from the command line which will either place the ’moov atom’ metadata in the beginning of the MP4 file or run the qt-faststart as a post processing operation in ffmpeg so the generated file is stream-able through the internet ?
I can of course run it as a separate command, but would prefer it to be something
- as an option within ffmpeg, or
- as part of a post conversion, command line option when converting the video files via ffmpeg
Edit 1
http://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg.html#mov
MOV / MP4 muxer
The muxer options are :
‘-moov_size bytes’
Reserves space for the moov atom at the beginning of the file instead of
placing the moov atom at the end. If the space reserved is insufficient,
muxing will fail. -
Thread count option in FFmpeg for FASTEST conversion to h264 ?
5 septembre 2013, par Saptarshi BiswasI need to maximize speed while converting videos using FFmpeg to h264
- Any input format of source videos
- User's machine can have any number of cores
- Power and memory consumption are non-issues
Of course, there are a whole bunch of options that can be tweaked but this question is particularly about choosing the best
-thread <count></count>
option. I am trying to find an ideal thread count as a function of- no. of cores
- input video format
- h264-friendly values maybe ?
- anything else missed above ?
I am aware the default
-thread 0
follows one-thread-per-core approach which is supposed to be optimal. But I am not sure if this is time or space-optimized. Also, on certain testcases, I've seen more threads (say 4 threads on my dual core test machine) finishes quicker than the default.Any other direction, say configure options w.r.t. threads, worth pursuing ?