
Recherche avancée
Médias (1)
-
Collections - Formulaire de création rapide
19 février 2013, par
Mis à jour : Février 2013
Langue : français
Type : Image
Autres articles (46)
-
Des sites réalisés avec MediaSPIP
2 mai 2011, parCette page présente quelques-uns des sites fonctionnant sous MediaSPIP.
Vous pouvez bien entendu ajouter le votre grâce au formulaire en bas de page. -
HTML5 audio and video support
13 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP uses HTML5 video and audio tags to play multimedia files, taking advantage of the latest W3C innovations supported by modern browsers.
The MediaSPIP player used has been created specifically for MediaSPIP and can be easily adapted to fit in with a specific theme.
For older browsers the Flowplayer flash fallback is used.
MediaSPIP allows for media playback on major mobile platforms with the above (...) -
De l’upload à la vidéo finale [version standalone]
31 janvier 2010, parLe chemin d’un document audio ou vidéo dans SPIPMotion est divisé en trois étapes distinctes.
Upload et récupération d’informations de la vidéo source
Dans un premier temps, il est nécessaire de créer un article SPIP et de lui joindre le document vidéo "source".
Au moment où ce document est joint à l’article, deux actions supplémentaires au comportement normal sont exécutées : La récupération des informations techniques des flux audio et video du fichier ; La génération d’une vignette : extraction d’une (...)
Sur d’autres sites (5674)
-
ffmpeg doesn't install h264 OS X Lion
21 mars 2012, par Drew CInstalling ffmpeg on OS X 10.7. I need to use libavformat/h264 and libavcodec/h264, and I can see the source for those libraries in my download of ffmpeg, but after I configure and install, those two libraries can't be found. How do I configure the installation to be able to use those libraries ?
Edit :
I suppose, in a broader sense, my question is : how do I access the methods and data types defined in ffmpeg's h264 class ? -
Method For Crawling Google
28 mai 2011, par Multimedia Mike — Big DataI wanted to crawl Google in order to harvest a large corpus of certain types of data as yielded by a certain search term (we’ll call it “term” for this exercise). Google doesn’t appear to offer any API to automatically harvest their search results (why would they ?). So I sat down and thought about how to do it. This is the solution I came up with.
FAQ
Q : Is this legal / ethical / compliant with Google’s terms of service ?
A : Does it look like I care ? Moving right along…Manual Crawling Process
For this exercise, I essentially automated the task that would be performed by a human. It goes something like this :- Search for “term”
- On the first page of results, download each of the 10 results returned
- Click on the next page of results
- Go to step 2, until Google doesn’t return anymore pages of search results
Google returns up to 1000 results for a given search term. Fetching them 10 at a time is less than efficient. Fortunately, the search URL can easily be tweaked to return up to 100 results per page.
Expanding Reach
Problem : 1000 results for the “term” search isn’t that many. I need a way to expand the search. I’m not aiming for relevancy ; I’m just searching for random examples of some data that occurs around the internet.My solution for this is to refine the search using the “site” wildcard. For example, you can ask Google to search for “term” at all Canadian domains using “site :.ca”. So, the manual process now involves harvesting up to 1000 results for every single internet top level domain (TLD). But many TLDs can be more granular than that. For example, there are 50 sub-domains under .us, one for each state (e.g., .ca.us, .ny.us). Those all need to be searched independently. Same for all the sub-domains under TLDs which don’t allow domains under the main TLD, such as .uk (search under .co.uk, .ac.uk, etc.).
Another extension is to combine “term” searches with other terms that are likely to have a rich correlation with “term”. For example, if “term” is relevant to various scientific fields, search for “term” in conjunction with various scientific disciplines.
Algorithmically
My solution is to create an SQLite database that contains a table of search seeds. Each seed is essentially a “site :” string combined with a starting index.Each TLD and sub-TLD is inserted as a searchseed record with a starting index of 0.
A script performs the following crawling algorithm :
- Fetch the next record from the searchseed table which has not been crawled
- Fetch search result page from Google
- Scrape URLs from page and insert each into URL table
- Mark the searchseed record as having been crawled
- If the results page indicates there are more results for this search, insert a new searchseed for the same seed but with a starting index 100 higher
Digging Into Sites
Sometimes, Google notes that certain sites are particularly rich sources of “term” and offers to let you search that site for “term”. This basically links to another search for ‘term site:somesite”. That site gets its own search seed and the program might harvest up to 1000 URLs from that site alone.Harvesting the Data
Armed with a database of URLs, employ the following algorithm :- Fetch a random URL from the database which has yet to be downloaded
- Try to download it
- For goodness sake, have a mechanism in place to detect whether the download process has stalled and automatically kill it after a certain period of time
- Store the data and update the database, noting where the information was stored and that it is already downloaded
This step is easy to parallelize by simply executing multiple copies of the script. It is useful to update the URL table to indicate that one process is already trying to download a URL so multiple processes don’t duplicate work.
Acting Human
A few factors here :- Google allegedly doesn’t like automated programs crawling its search results. Thus, at the very least, don’t let your script advertise itself as an automated program. At a basic level, this means forging the User-Agent : HTTP header. By default, Python’s urllib2 will identify itself as a programming language. Change this to a well-known browser string.
- Be patient ; don’t fire off these search requests as quickly as possible. My crawling algorithm inserts a random delay of a few seconds in between each request. This can still yield hundreds of useful URLs per minute.
- On harvesting the data : Even though you can parallelize this and download data as quickly as your connection can handle, it’s a good idea to randomize the URLs. If you hypothetically had 4 download processes running at once and they got to a point in the URL table which had many URLs from a single site, the server might be configured to reject too many simultaneous requests from a single client.
Conclusion
Anyway, that’s just the way I would (and did) do it. What did I do with all the data ? That’s a subject for a different post. -
Anomalie #2618 : le bouton "ajouter un document" est mensonger
28 mars 2012, par cedric -Discussion du 27/03/2011 sur spip-trad intitulée "télécharger vs. upload / download"