Recherche avancée

Médias (0)

Mot : - Tags -/xmlrpc

Aucun média correspondant à vos critères n’est disponible sur le site.

Autres articles (67)

  • Mise à jour de la version 0.1 vers 0.2

    24 juin 2013, par

    Explications des différents changements notables lors du passage de la version 0.1 de MediaSPIP à la version 0.3. Quelles sont les nouveautés
    Au niveau des dépendances logicielles Utilisation des dernières versions de FFMpeg (>= v1.2.1) ; Installation des dépendances pour Smush ; Installation de MediaInfo et FFprobe pour la récupération des métadonnées ; On n’utilise plus ffmpeg2theora ; On n’installe plus flvtool2 au profit de flvtool++ ; On n’installe plus ffmpeg-php qui n’est plus maintenu au (...)

  • Personnaliser en ajoutant son logo, sa bannière ou son image de fond

    5 septembre 2013, par

    Certains thèmes prennent en compte trois éléments de personnalisation : l’ajout d’un logo ; l’ajout d’une bannière l’ajout d’une image de fond ;

  • Ecrire une actualité

    21 juin 2013, par

    Présentez les changements dans votre MédiaSPIP ou les actualités de vos projets sur votre MédiaSPIP grâce à la rubrique actualités.
    Dans le thème par défaut spipeo de MédiaSPIP, les actualités sont affichées en bas de la page principale sous les éditoriaux.
    Vous pouvez personnaliser le formulaire de création d’une actualité.
    Formulaire de création d’une actualité Dans le cas d’un document de type actualité, les champs proposés par défaut sont : Date de publication ( personnaliser la date de publication ) (...)

Sur d’autres sites (14015)

  • Extract frames from a video results in abnormaly more frames for each fps by using ffmpeg

    15 juin 2021, par alanzzz

    I have a job of using ffmpeg to extract the frames averagely from a video, with different fps. I use this command for it.

    


    ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -r specified_fps -q:v 2 image %4d.png

    


    And I have 3 questions about this task.

    


      

    1. What I expect is that if I double the fps, the number of extracted frames will also get doubled. However, that's not the case. Take one of the input videos as an example. I get 2 extra frames for all the sample factors (80 / 158 / 236 / 392 v.s. 78 / 156 / 234 / 390). Does it related to the mechanism of picking/dropping frames when extracting frames from a video? (credit to @Tom Yan)
    2. 


    


    video info

    


      

    • Duration : 1min18s
    • 


    • Frame rate mode : constant (CFR)
    • 


    • Frame rate : 30.0 FPS
    • 


    • Total number of frames : 2340
    • 


    


    Config setting & results

    


    





    


    


    


    


    


    



    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    FPS Actual num of frames correct num of frames
    1 80 78
    2 158 156
    3 236 234
    5 392 390

    


    


      

    1. I check for the output images, the extracted frames for different fps are totally different from each other. In other words, for example, the 1st image for fps=1 is not the same as the 1st image for fps=2. Is that legitimate ? And is it possible for me the get some identical images for different fps ?

      


    2. 


    3. The last problem is that for some videos I use, the difference between the 1st and 2nd image is different from the difference between the 2nd and 3rd. While for the remaining images, the differences become average. To be specific, there is only a slight change from 1st to 2nd frame, while for 2nd to 3rd, 3rd to 4th, and so on, the changes are the same, which is normally distributed according to the specified FPS. I am wondering why such a case happens ? Does it relate to the I-frame, B-frame, P-frame, GOP, or IDR ?

      


    4. 


    


    I am new to this field and cannot find some useful info from other places. I've tried my best to describe my questions clearly. Feel free to leave some comments. Any help would do me a great favor. Thanks in advance !

    


  • About image opacity

    23 octobre 2013, par Mikko Koppanen — Imagick

    There is a common misconception that Imagick::setImageOpacity() would work to reduce the opacity of the image. However, as the name says the method actually sets the opacity throughout the image and thus affects also transparent areas.

    To demonstrate let’s first look at this image of a red circle on a transparent background :

    Now, let’s apply setImageOpacity on the image :

    1. < ?php
    2. $im = new Imagick (’red-circle.png’) ;
    3. $im->setImageOpacity (0.5) ;
    4. $im->writeImage (’red-circle-setopacity.png’) ;
    5.  ?>

    As we can see from the resulting image the transparent background is affected as well.

    In order to actually reduce the opacity of the opaque parts Imagick::evaluateImage can be used instead :

    1. < ?php
    2. $im = new Imagick (’red-circle.png’) ;
    3.  
    4. /* Divide the alpha channel value by 2 */
    5. $im->evaluateImage(Imagick: :EVALUATE_DIVIDE, 2, Imagick: :CHANNEL_ALPHA) ;
    6. $im->writeImage (’red-circle-divide.png’) ;
    7.  ?>

    And here are the results :

    As the background is already fully transparent so the divide operation causes no changes to it.

    Similar example is available in the PHP manual http://php.net/imagick.evaluateimage and I added a note to setImageOpacity page as well (at the time of writing it has not synced to documentation mirrors yet).

  • Padding thumbnail with color

    9 juin 2010, par Mikko Koppanen — Imagick, PHP stuff

    I know, it’s been a while since I last blogged. This is because a lot of things are happening in my personal life. I recently relocated to London from Finland and started a new job. Things are quite busy but I will try to post an example now and then. In the meanwhile I would like to hear about sites using Imagick, so if your project is not super secret please post an url and maybe a small explanation what you’re doing with Imagick on the site. This is purely for my personal interest.

    Anyway, to the point. Today’s example originates from a question asked by a user. How do I thumbnail the image inside given dimensions proportionally and fill the “blank” areas with a color ? Well, the answer is here :)

    The code is for Imagick 2.1.0 but adapting to older versions should not be hard.

    1. < ?php
    2. /* Define width and height of the thumbnail */
    3. $width = 100 ;
    4. $height = 100 ;
    5.  
    6. /* Instanciate and read the image in */
    7. $im = new Imagick( "test.png" ) ;
    8.  
    9. /* Fit the image into $width x $height box
    10.  The third parameter fits the image into a "bounding box" */
    11. $im->thumbnailImage( $width, $height, true ) ;
    12.  
    13. /* Create a canvas with the desired color */
    14. $canvas = new Imagick() ;
    15. $canvas->newImage( $width, $height, ’pink’, ’png’ ) ;
    16.  
    17. /* Get the image geometry */
    18. $geometry = $im->getImageGeometry() ;
    19.  
    20. /* The overlay x and y coordinates */
    21. $x = ( $width - $geometry[’width’] ) / 2 ;
    22. $y = ( $height - $geometry[’height’] ) / 2 ;
    23.  
    24. /* Composite on the canvas */
    25. $canvas->compositeImage( $im, imagick: :COMPOSITE_OVER, $x, $y ) ;
    26.  
    27. /* Output the image*/
    28. header( "Content-Type : image/png" ) ;
    29. echo $canvas ;
    30.  
    31.  ?>

    The source image :
    test.png

    The resulting image :
    testphp.png