Recherche avancée

Sur d’autres sites (4560)

• How to complete your privacy policy with Matomo analytics under GDPR

  25 avril 2018, par InnoCraft

  Important note : this blog post has been written by digital analysts, not lawyers. The purpose of this article is to show you how to complete your existing privacy policy by adding the parts related to Matomo in order to comply with GDPR. This work comes from our interpretation of the UK privacy commission : ICO. It cannot be considered as professional legal advice. So as GDPR, this information is subject to change. We strongly advise you to have a look at the different privacy authorities in order to have up to date information. This blog post contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

  Neither the GDPR official text or ICO are mentioning the words ‘privacy policy’. They use the words ‘privacy notice’ instead. As explained within our previous blog post about “How to write a privacy notice for Matomo”, the key concepts of privacy information are transparency and accessibility which are making the privacy notice very long.

  As a result, we prefer splitting the privacy notice into two parts :

  • Privacy notice : straight to the point information about how personal data is processed at the time of the data collection. This is the subject of the our previous blog post.
  • Privacy policy : a web page explaining in detail all the personal data you are processing and how visitors/users can exercise their rights. This is the blog post you are reading.

  Writing/updating your privacy policy page can be one of the most challenging task under GDPR.

  In order to make this mission less complicated, we have designed a template which you can use to complete the privacy policy part that concerns Matomo.

  Which information should your privacy policy include ?

  ICO is giving a clear checklist about what a privacy policy has to contain when the data is obtained from the data subject :

  1. Identity and contact details of the controller and where applicable, the controller’s representative and the data protection officer.
  2. Purpose of the processing and the legal basis for the processing.
  3. The legitimate interests of the controller or third party, where applicable.
  4. Any recipient or categories of recipients of the personal data.
  5. Details of transfers to third country and safeguards.
  6. Retention period or criteria used to determine the retention period.
  7. The existence of each of data subject’s rights.
  8. The right to withdraw consent at any time, where relevant.
  9. The right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority.
  10. Whether the provision of personal data part of a statutory or contractual requirement or obligation and possible consequences of failing to provide the personal data.
  11. The existence of automated decision-making, including profiling and information about how decisions are made, the significance and the consequences.

  So in order to use Matomo with due respect to GDPR you need to answer each of those points within your privacy policy.

  Matomo’s privacy policy template

  You will find below some examples to each point requested by GDPR. Those answers are just guidelines, they are not perfect, feel free to copy/paste them according to your needs.

  Note that this template needs to be tweaked according to the lawful basis you choose.

  1 – About Matomo

  Note : this part should describe the data controller instead, which is your company. But as you may already have included this part within your existing privacy policy, we prefer here to introduce what is Matomo.

  Matomo is an open source web analytics platform. A web analytics platform is used by a website owner in order to measure, collect, analyse and report visitors data for purposes of understanding and optimizing their website. If you would like to see what Matomo looks like, you can access a demo version at : https://demo.matomo.org.

  2 – Purpose of the processing

  Matomo is used to analyse the behaviour of the website visitors to identify potential pitfalls ; not found pages, search engine indexing issues, which contents are the most appreciated… Once the data is processed (number of visitors reaching a not found pages, viewing only one page…), Matomo is generating reports for website owners to take action, for example changing the layout of the pages, publishing some fresh content… etc.

  Matomo is processing the following personal data :

  Pick up the one you are using :

  • Cookies
  • IP address
  • User ID
  • Custom Dimensions
  • Custom Variables
  • Order ID
  • Location of the user

  And also :

  • Date and time
  • Title of the page being viewed
  • URL of the page being viewed
  • URL of the page that was viewed prior to the current page
  • Screen resolution
  • Time in local timezone
  • Files that were clicked and downloaded
  • Link clicks to an outside domain
  • Pages generation time
  • Country, region, city
  • Main Language of the browser
  • User Agent of the browser

  This list can be completed with additional features such as :

  • Session recording, mouse events (movements, content forms and clicks)
  • Form interactions
  • Media interactions
  • A/B Tests

  Pick up one of the two :

  1. The processing of personal data with Matomo is based on legitimate interests, or :
  2. The processing of personal data with Matomo is based on explicit consent. Your privacy is our highest concern. That’s why we will not process any personal data with Matomo unless you give us clear explicit consent.

  3 – The legitimate interests

  This content applies only if you are processing personal data based on legitimate interests. You need here to justify your legitimate interests to process personal data. It is a set of questions described here.

  Processing your personal data such as cookies is helping us identify what is working and what is not on our website. For example, it helps us identify if the way we are communicating is engaging or not and how we can organize the structure of the website better. Our team is benefiting from the processing of your personal data, and they are directly acting on the website. By processing your personal data, you can profit from a website which is getting better and better.

  Without the data, we would not be able to provide you the service we are currently offering to you. Your data will be used only to improve the user experience on our website and help you find the information you are looking for.

  4 – Recipient of the personal data

  The personal data received through Matomo are sent to :

  • Our company.
  • Our web hosting provider : name and contact details of the web hosting provider.

  Note : If you are using the Matomo Analytics Cloud by InnoCraft the web hosting provider is “InnoCraft, 150 Willis St, 6011 Wellington, New Zealand“.

  5 – Details of transfers to third country and safeguards

  Matomo data is hosted in Name of the country.

  If the country mentioned is not within the EU, you need to mention here the appropriate safeguards, for example : our data is hosted in the United States within company XYZ, registered to the Privacy Shield program.

  Note : The Matomo Analytics Cloud by InnoCraft is currently hosted in France. If you are using the cloud-hosted solution of Matomo, use “France” as name of the country.

  6 – Retention period or criteria used to determine the retention period

  We are keeping the personal data captured within Matomo for a period of indicate here the period.

  Justify your choice, for example : as our data is hosted in France, we are applying the French law which defines a retention period of no more than 13 months. You can set the retention period in Matomo by using the following feature.

  7 – The existence of each of the data subject’s rights

  If you are processing personal data with Matomo based on legitimate interest :

  As Matomo is processing personal data on legitimate interests, you can exercise the following rights :

  • Right of access : you can ask us at any time to access your personal data.
  • Right to erasure : you can ask us at any time to delete all the personal data we are processing about you.
  • Right to object : you can object to the tracking of your personal data by using the following opt-out feature :

  Insert here the opt-out feature.

  If you are processing personal data with Matomo based on explicit consent :

  As Matomo is processing personal data on explicit consent, you can exercise the following rights :

  • Right of access : you can ask us at any time to access your personal data.
  • Right to erasure : you can ask us at any time to delete all the personal data we are processing about you.
  • Right to portability : you can ask us at any time for a copy of all the personal data we are processing about you in Matomo.
  • Right to withdraw consent : you can withdraw your consent at any time by clicking on the following button.

  8 – The right to withdraw consent at any time

  If you are processing personal data under the consent lawful basis, you need to include the following section :

  You can withdraw at any time your consent by clicking here (insert here the Matomo tracking code to remove consent).

  9 – The right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority

  If you think that the way we process your personal data with Matomo analytics is infringing the law, you have the right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority.

  10 – Whether the provision of personal data is part of a statutory or contractual requirement ; or obligation and possible consequences of failing to provide the personal data

  If you wish us to not process any personal data with Matomo, you can opt-out from it at any time. There will be no consequences at all regarding the use of our website.

  11 – The existence of automated decision-making, including profiling and information about how decisions are made, the significance and the consequences

  Matomo is not doing any profiling.

   

  That’s the end of our blog post. We hope you enjoyed reading it and that it will help you get through the GDPR compliance process. If you have any questions dealing with this privacy policy in particular, do not hesitate to contact us.

  The post How to complete your privacy policy with Matomo analytics under GDPR appeared first on Analytics Platform - Matomo.

• Screen capture (video screencast) with FFMPEG with very low FPS

  20 septembre 2023, par jesusda

  I recently changed PCs, I went from having an Intel Core i5 4460 with integrated graphics card to a Xeon E5 2678 v3 with AMD RADEON RX 550 graphics.

  


  On paper, the new PC is on the order of 3 to 7 times more powerful than the old one and I can attest that this is the case in daily use, video and image editing etc. The advantage of having so many cores and threads available is palpable. In terms of games I haven't tried it because I'm not really a gamer and the few games I use are the typical free ones that come with Debian and some emulators that, honestly, already worked fine with the old PC.

  


  However there is one task that brings me head over heels for its terrible performance : video screen capture.

  


  With my old PC I was able to capture at over 60 fps at full screen while doing any task I needed to record.

  


  Even with my lenovo thinkpad x230 I am able to capture screen at over 80fps with total fluency.

  


  The command I have always used is :

  


  ffmpeg  -f x11grab -draw_mouse 1 -framerate 60 -video_size 1920x1200 -i :0.0+1680,0  -qscale 0 -pix_fmt yuv420p -c:v libx264 -preset medium -qp 0 -q:v 1 -s 1920x1200 -f matroska -threads 4 video.mkv


  


  notes :

  


  -video_size 1920x1200 -i :0.0+1680,0 y -s 1920x1200 are the dimensions and position of the region to capture (my right monitor).

  


  Notice that I even used -preset medium and software encoding, so I got very good quality even with that parameter setting and without ever going below 60 fps.

  


  What happens to me now ?

  


  The equipment is unable to capture more than 20 fps which makes any video invalid, with frame drops and not even reach 30fps, which would be the minimum required.

  


  In addition, it is quite noticeable the decrease in responsiveness of the PC as soon as I launch the command. That is, all that fluidity and smoothness that is appreciated when working normally, disappears and even moving a window from one side to another is rough and stumbling.

  


  I have tried with different parameters of ffmpeg, to capture raw, without encoding.

  


  I have tried saving the resulting video directly to RAM disk in order to avoid the possible bottleneck of writing to disk. It doesn't affect it at all.

  


  So, does anyone have any suggestions as to at least where I can dig further to find a solution to the problem ?

  


  Additional data, in case it helps :

  


  $ → inxi
CPU: 12-Core Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 (-MT MCP-)
speed/min/max: 1201/1200/3300 MHz Kernel: 5.10.0-0.bpo.4-amd64 x86_64
Up: 1d 6h 55m Mem: 6427.6/32012.4 MiB (20.1%)
Storage: 13.76 TiB (55.9% used) Procs: 433 Shell: bash 5.0.18 inxi: 3.0.32


$ → ffmpeg -v
ffmpeg version 4.1.6 Copyright (c) 2000-2020 the FFmpeg developers
  built with gcc 8 (Debian 8.3.0-6)
  configuration: --disable-decoder=amrnb --disable-decoder=libopenjpeg --disable-libopencv --disable-outdev=sdl2 --disable-podpages --disable-sndio --disable-stripping --enable-libaom --enable-avfilter --enable-avresample --enable-gcrypt --disable-gnutls --enable-openssl --enable-gpl --enable-libass --enable-libbluray --enable-libbs2b --enable-libcaca --enable-libcdio --enable-libcodec2 --enable-libfdk-aac --enable-libfontconfig --enable-libfreetype --enable-libfribidi --enable-libgme --enable-libgsm --enable-libilbc --enable-libkvazaar --enable-libmp3lame --enable-libopencore-amrnb --enable-libopencore-amrwb --enable-libopenh264 --enable-libopenjpeg --enable-libopenmpt --enable-libopus --enable-libpulse --enable-librubberband --enable-libshine --enable-libsnappy --enable-libsoxr --enable-libspeex --enable-libtesseract --enable-libtheora --enable-libvidstab --enable-libvo-amrwbenc --enable-libvorbis --enable-libvpx --enable-libx265 --enable-libzimg --enable-libxvid --enable-libzvbi --enable-nonfree --enable-opencl --enable-opengl --enable-postproc --enable-pthreads --enable-shared --enable-version3 --enable-libwebp --incdir=/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu --libdir=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr --toolchain=hardened --enable-frei0r --enable-chromaprint --enable-libx264 --enable-libiec61883 --enable-libdc1394 --enable-vaapi --enable-libmfx --enable-libvmaf --disable-altivec --shlibdir=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu
  libavutil      56. 22.100 / 56. 22.100
  libavcodec     58. 35.100 / 58. 35.100
  libavformat    58. 20.100 / 58. 20.100
  libavdevice    58.  5.100 / 58.  5.100
  libavfilter     7. 40.101 /  7. 40.101
  libavresample   4.  0.  0 /  4.  0.  0
  libswscale      5.  3.100 /  5.  3.100
  libswresample   3.  3.100 /  3.  3.100
  libpostproc    55.  3.100 / 55.  3.100


  


  I have the free amdgpu drivers (not amdgpu-pro), but I activated OpenCL just in case.

  


  I followed this tutorial.

  


  $ → glxinfo | grep OpenGL
OpenGL vendor string: AMD
OpenGL renderer string: Radeon RX550/550 Series (POLARIS12, DRM 3.40.0, 5.10.0-0.bpo.4-amd64, LLVM 11.0.1)
OpenGL core profile version string: 4.6 (Core Profile) Mesa 20.3.4
OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 4.60
OpenGL core profile context flags: (none)
OpenGL core profile profile mask: core profile
OpenGL core profile extensions:
OpenGL version string: 4.6 (Compatibility Profile) Mesa 20.3.4
OpenGL shading language version string: 4.60
OpenGL context flags: (none)
OpenGL profile mask: compatibility profile
OpenGL extensions:
OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.2 Mesa 20.3.4
OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES 3.20
OpenGL ES profile extensions:





$ → clinfo
Number of platforms                               1
  Platform Name                                   Clover
  Platform Vendor                                 Mesa
  Platform Version                                OpenCL 1.1 Mesa 20.3.4
  Platform Profile                                FULL_PROFILE
  Platform Extensions                             cl_khr_icd
  Platform Extensions function suffix             MESA

  Platform Name                                   Clover
Number of devices                                 1
  Device Name                                     Radeon RX550/550 Series (POLARIS12, DRM 3.40.0, 5.10.0-0.bpo.4-amd64, LLVM 11.0.1)
  Device Vendor                                   AMD
  Device Vendor ID                                0x1002
  Device Version                                  OpenCL 1.1 Mesa 20.3.4
  Driver Version                                  20.3.4
  Device OpenCL C Version                         OpenCL C 1.1
  Device Type                                     GPU
  Device Profile                                  FULL_PROFILE
  Device Available                                Yes
  Compiler Available                              Yes
  Max compute units                               8
  Max clock frequency                             1183MHz
  Max work item dimensions                        3
  Max work item sizes                             256x256x256
  Max work group size                             256
  Preferred work group size multiple              64
  Preferred / native vector sizes
    char                                                16 / 16
    short                                                8 / 8
    int                                                  4 / 4
    long                                                 2 / 2
    half                                                 0 / 0        (n/a)
    float                                                4 / 4
    double                                               2 / 2        (cl_khr_fp64)
  Half-precision Floating-point support           (n/a)
  Single-precision Floating-point support         (core)
    Denormals                                     No
    Infinity and NANs                             Yes
    Round to nearest                              Yes
    Round to zero                                 No
    Round to infinity                             No
    IEEE754-2008 fused multiply-add               No
    Support is emulated in software               No
    Correctly-rounded divide and sqrt operations  No
  Double-precision Floating-point support         (cl_khr_fp64)
    Denormals                                     Yes
    Infinity and NANs                             Yes
    Round to nearest                              Yes
    Round to zero                                 Yes
    Round to infinity                             Yes
    IEEE754-2008 fused multiply-add               Yes
    Support is emulated in software               No
  Address bits                                    64, Little-Endian
  Global memory size                              3221225472 (3GiB)
  Error Correction support                        No
  Max memory allocation                           1717986918 (1.6GiB)
  Unified memory for Host and Device              No
  Minimum alignment for any data type             128 bytes
  Alignment of base address                       32768 bits (4096 bytes)
  Global Memory cache type                        None
  Image support                                   No
  Local memory type                               Local
  Local memory size                               32768 (32KiB)
  Max number of constant args                     16
  Max constant buffer size                        67108864 (64MiB)
  Max size of kernel argument                     1024
  Queue properties
    Out-of-order execution                        No
    Profiling                                     Yes
  Profiling timer resolution                      0ns
  Execution capabilities
    Run OpenCL kernels                            Yes
    Run native kernels                            No
  Device Extensions cl_khr_byte_addressable_store cl_khr_global_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_global_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_int64_base_atomics cl_khr_int64_extended_atomics cl_khr_fp64

NULL platform behavior
  clGetPlatformInfo(NULL, CL_PLATFORM_NAME, ...)  Clover
  clGetDeviceIDs(NULL, CL_DEVICE_TYPE_ALL, ...)   Success [MESA]
  clCreateContext(NULL, ...) [default]            Success [MESA]
  clCreateContextFromType(NULL, CL_DEVICE_TYPE_DEFAULT)  Success (1)
    Platform Name                                 Clover
    Device Name                                   Radeon RX550/550 Series (POLARIS12, DRM 3.40.0, 5.10.0-0.bpo.4-amd64, LLVM 11.0.1)
  clCreateContextFromType(NULL, CL_DEVICE_TYPE_CPU)  No devices found in platform
  clCreateContextFromType(NULL, CL_DEVICE_TYPE_GPU)  Success (1)
    Platform Name                                 Clover
    Device Name                                   Radeon RX550/550 Series (POLARIS12, DRM 3.40.0, 5.10.0-0.bpo.4-amd64, LLVM 11.0.1)
  clCreateContextFromType(NULL, CL_DEVICE_TYPE_ACCELERATOR)  No devices found in platform
  clCreateContextFromType(NULL, CL_DEVICE_TYPE_CUSTOM)  No devices found in platform
  clCreateContextFromType(NULL, CL_DEVICE_TYPE_ALL)  Success (1)
    Platform Name                                 Clover
    Device Name                                   Radeon RX550/550 Series (POLARIS12, DRM 3.40.0, 5.10.0-0.bpo.4-amd64, LLVM 11.0.1)

ICD loader properties
  ICD loader Name                                 OpenCL ICD Loader
  ICD loader Vendor                               OCL Icd free software
  ICD loader Version                              2.2.12
  ICD loader Profile                              OpenCL 2.2


  


  This would not be a tearing problem, as no tearing is visible when playing videos and the TearFree driver policy is enabled.

  


  $ → xrandr --verbose | grep TearFree
    TearFree: on
    TearFree: on
    TearFree: on


  


• Vedanti and Max Sound vs. Google

  14 août 2014, par Multimedia Mike — Legal/Ethical

  Vedanti Systems Limited (VSL) and Max Sound Coporation filed a lawsuit against Google recently. Ordinarily, I wouldn’t care about corporate legal battles. However, this one interests me because it’s multimedia-related. I’m curious to know how coding technology patents might hold up in a real court case.

  Here’s the most entertaining complaint in the lawsuit :

  Despite Google’s well-publicized Code of Conduct — “Don’t be Evil” — which it explains is “about doing the right thing,” “following the law,” and “acting honorably,” Google, in fact, has an established pattern of conduct which is the exact opposite of its claimed piety.

  I wonder if this is the first known case in which Google has been sued over its long-obsoleted “Don’t be evil” mantra ?

  Researching The Plaintiffs
  
  I think I made a mistake by assuming this lawsuit might have merit. My first order of business was to see what the plaintiff organizations have produced. I have a strong feeling that these might be run of the mill patent trolls.

  VSL currently has a blank web page. Further, the Wayback Machine only has pages reaching back to 2011. The earliest page lists these claims against a plain black background (I’ve highlighted some of the more boisterous claims and the passages that make it appear that Vedanti doesn’t actually produce anything but is strictly an IP organization) :

  The inventions key :
  The patent and software reduced any data content, without compressing, up to a 97% total reduction of the data which also produces a lossless result. This physics based invention is often called the Holy Grail.

  Vedanti Systems Intellectual Property
  Our strategic IP portfolio is granted in all of the world’s largest technology development and use countries. A major value indemnification of our licensee products is the early date of invention filing and subsequent Issue. Vedanti IP has an intrinsic 20 year patent protection and valuation in royalties and licensing. The original data transmission art has no prior art against it.

  Vedanti Systems invented among other firsts, The Slice and Partitioning of Macroblocks within a RGB Tri level region in a frame to select or not, the pixel.

  Vedanti Systems invention is used in nearly every wireless chipset and handset in the world

  Our original pixel selection system revolutionized wireless handset communications. An example of this system “Slice” and “Macroblock Partitioning” is used throughout Satellite channel expansion, Wireless partitioning, Telecom – Video Conferencing, Surveillance Cameras, and 2010 developing Media applications.

  Vedanti Systems is a Semiconductor based software, applications, and IP Continuations Intellectual Property company.

  Let’s move onto the other plaintiff, Max Sound. They have a significantly more substantive website. They also have an Android app named Spins HD Audio, which appears to be little more than a music player based on the screenshots.

  Max Sound also has a stock ticker symbol : MAXD. Something clicked into place when I looked up their ticker symbol : While worth only a few pennies, it was worth a few more pennies after this lawsuit was announced, which might be one of the motivations behind the lawsuit.

  Here’s a trick I learned when I was looking for a new tech job last year : When I first look at a company’s website and am trying to figure out what they really do, I head straight to their jobs/careers page. A lot of corporate websites have way too much blathering corporatese that can be tough to cut through. But when I see what mix of talent and specific skills they are hoping to hire, that gives me a much better portrait of what the company does.

  The reason I bring this up is because this tech company doesn’t seem to have jobs/careers page.

  The Lawsuit
  The core complaint centers around Patent 7974339 : Optimized data transmission system and method. It was filed in July 2004 (or possibly as early as January 2002), issued in July 2011, and assigned (purchased ?) by Vedanti in May 2012. The lawsuit alleges that nearly everything Google has ever produced (or, more accurately, purchased) leverages the patented technology.

  The patent itself has 5 drawings. If you’ve ever seen a multimedia codec patent, or any whitepaper on a multimedia codec, you’ve seen these graphs before. E.g., “Raw pixels come in here -> some analysis happens here -> more analysis happens over here -> entropy coding -> final bitstream”. The text of a patent document isn’t meant to be particularly useful. I’ve tried to understand this stuff before and it never goes well. Skimming the text, I just see a blur of the words data, transmission, pixel, and matrix.

  So I read the complaint to try to figure out what this is all about. To summarize the storyline as narrated by the lawsuit, some inventors were unhappy with the state of video compression in 2001 and endeavored to create something better. So they did, and called it the VSL codec. This codec is so far undocumented on the MultimediaWiki, so it probably has yet to be seen “in the wild”. Good luck finding hard technical data on it now since searches for “VSL codec” are overwhelmed by articles about this lawsuit. Also, the original codec probably wasn’t called VSL because VSL is apparently an IP organization formed much later.

  Then, the protagonists of the lawsuit patented the codec. Then, years later, Google wanted to purchase a video codec that they could open source and use to supplant H.264.

  The complaint goes on to allege that in 2010, Google specifically contacted VSL to possibly license or acquire this mysterious VSL technology. Google was allegedly allowed to study the technology, eventually decided not to continue discussions, and shipped back the proprietary materials.

  Here’s where things get weird. When Google shipped back the materials, they allegedly shipped back a bunch of Post-It notes. The notes are alleged to contain a ton of incriminating evidence. The lawsuit claims that the notes contained such tidbits as :

  • Google was concerned that its infringement could be considered “recklessness” (the standard applicable to willful infringement) ;
  • Google personnel should “try” to destroy incriminating emails ;
  • Google should consider a “design around” because it was facing a “risk of litigation.”

  Actually, given Google’s acquisition of On2, I can totally believe that last one (On2’s codecs have famously contained a lot of weirdness which is commonly suspected to be attributable to designing around known patents).

  Anyway, a lot of this case seems to hinge on the authenticity of these Post-It notes :

  “65. The Post-It notes are unequivocal evidence of Google’s knowledge of the ’339 Patent and infringement by Defendants”

  I wish I could find a stock photo of a stack of Post-It notes in an evidence bag.

  I’ve worked at big technology companies. Big tech companies these days are very diligent about indoctrinating employees about IP liability issues. The reason this Post-It situation strikes me as odd is because the alleged contents of the notes basically outline everything the corporate lawyers tell you NOT to do.

  Analysis
  I’m trying to determine what specific algorithms and coding techniques. I guess I was expecting to see a specific claim that, “Our patent outlines this specific coding technique and here is unequivocal proof that Google A) uses the same technique, and B) specifically did so after looking at our patent.” I didn’t find that (well, a bit of part B, c.f., the Post-It note debacle), but maybe that’s not how these patent lawsuits operate. I’ve never kept up before.

  Maybe it’s just a patent troll. Maybe it’s for the stock bump. I’m expecting to see pump-n-dump stock spam featuring the stock symbol MAXD anytime now.

  I’ve never been interested in following a lawsuit case carefully before. I suddenly find myself wondering if I can subscribe to the RSS feed for this case ? Too much to hope for. But I found this item through Pando and maybe they’ll stay on top of it.