
Recherche avancée
Médias (91)
-
Les Miserables
9 décembre 2019, par
Mis à jour : Décembre 2019
Langue : français
Type : Textuel
-
VideoHandle
8 novembre 2019, par
Mis à jour : Novembre 2019
Langue : français
Type : Video
-
Somos millones 1
21 juillet 2014, par
Mis à jour : Juin 2015
Langue : français
Type : Video
-
Un test - mauritanie
3 avril 2014, par
Mis à jour : Avril 2014
Langue : français
Type : Textuel
-
Pourquoi Obama lit il mes mails ?
4 février 2014, par
Mis à jour : Février 2014
Langue : français
-
IMG 0222
6 octobre 2013, par
Mis à jour : Octobre 2013
Langue : français
Type : Image
Autres articles (75)
-
Le profil des utilisateurs
12 avril 2011, parChaque utilisateur dispose d’une page de profil lui permettant de modifier ses informations personnelle. Dans le menu de haut de page par défaut, un élément de menu est automatiquement créé à l’initialisation de MediaSPIP, visible uniquement si le visiteur est identifié sur le site.
L’utilisateur a accès à la modification de profil depuis sa page auteur, un lien dans la navigation "Modifier votre profil" est (...) -
La sauvegarde automatique de canaux SPIP
1er avril 2010, parDans le cadre de la mise en place d’une plateforme ouverte, il est important pour les hébergeurs de pouvoir disposer de sauvegardes assez régulières pour parer à tout problème éventuel.
Pour réaliser cette tâche on se base sur deux plugins SPIP : Saveauto qui permet une sauvegarde régulière de la base de donnée sous la forme d’un dump mysql (utilisable dans phpmyadmin) mes_fichiers_2 qui permet de réaliser une archive au format zip des données importantes du site (les documents, les éléments (...) -
ANNEXE : Les plugins utilisés spécifiquement pour la ferme
5 mars 2010, parLe site central/maître de la ferme a besoin d’utiliser plusieurs plugins supplémentaires vis à vis des canaux pour son bon fonctionnement. le plugin Gestion de la mutualisation ; le plugin inscription3 pour gérer les inscriptions et les demandes de création d’instance de mutualisation dès l’inscription des utilisateurs ; le plugin verifier qui fournit une API de vérification des champs (utilisé par inscription3) ; le plugin champs extras v2 nécessité par inscription3 (...)
Sur d’autres sites (5050)
-
The First Problem
19 janvier 2011, par Multimedia Mike — HTML5A few years ago, The Linux Hater made the following poignant observation regarding Linux driver support :
Drivers are only just the beginning... But for some reason y’all like to focus on the drivers. You know why lusers do that ? Because it just happens to be the problem that people notice first.
And so it is with the HTML5 video codec debate, re-invigorated in the past week by Google’s announcement of dropping native H.264 support in their own HTML5 video tag implementation. As I read up on the fiery debate, I kept wondering why people are so obsessed with this issue. Then I remembered the Linux Hater’s post and realized that the video codec issue is simply the first problem that most people notice regarding HTML5 video.
I appreciate that the video codec debate has prompted Niedermayer to post on his blog once more. Otherwise, I’m just munching popcorn on the sidelines, amused and mildly relieved that the various factions are vociferously attacking each other rather than that little project I help with at work.
Getting back to the "first problem" aspect— there’s so much emphasis on the video codec ; I wonder why no one ever, ever mentions word one about an audio codec. AAC is typically the codec that pairs with H.264 in the MPEG stack. Dark Shikari once mentioned that "AAC’s licensing terms are exponentially more onerous than H.264′s. If Google didn’t want to use H.264, they would sure as hell not want to use AAC." Most people are probably using "H.264" to refer to the entire MPEG/H.264/AAC stack, even if they probably don’t understand what all of those pieces mean.
Anyway, The Linux Hater’s driver piece continues :
Once y’all have drivers, the fight will move to the next layer up. And like I said, it’s a lot harder at that layer.
A few months ago, when I wanted to post the WebM output of my new VP8 encoder and thought it would be a nice touch to deliver it via a video tag, I ignored the video codec problem (just encoded a VP8/WebM file) only to immediately discover a problem at a different layer— specifically, embedding a file using a video tag triggers a full file download when the page is loaded, which is unacceptable from end user and web hosting perspectives. This is a known issue but doesn’t get as much attention, I guess because there are bigger problems to solve first (c.f. video codec issue).
For other issues, check out the YouTube blog’s HTML5 post or Hulu’s post that also commented on HTML5. Issues such as video streaming flexibility, content protection, fullscreen video, webcam/microphone input, and numerous others are rarely mentioned in the debates. Only "video codec" is of paramount importance.
But I’m lending too much weight to the cacophony of a largely uninformed internet debate. Realistically, I know there are many talented engineers down in the trenches working to solve at least some of these problems. To tie this in with the Linux driver example, I’m consistently stunned these days regarding how simple it is to get Linux working on a new computer— most commodity consumer hardware really does just work right out of the box. Maybe one day, we’ll wake up and find that HTML5 video has advanced to the point that it solves all of the relevant problems to make it the simple and obvious choice for delivering web video in nearly all situations.
It won’t be this year.
-
FFmpeg Libraries : How Do I Convert a Video to 4 Level Grayscale Video at 160x100 Pixels and as Raw Data
15 avril 2014, par pimathbrainiacThis seems like an odd question, so I am going to start from the beginning :
I am a calculator programmer, specifically a Ti-89 programmer, and I'm trying to make a video player for it. I have the code for the calculator side done already, but I need to be able to convert video to a specific format that works as follows :
Each frame is 4 level grayscale, where there are 2 bytes for every 8 horizontal pixels, a "back," or dark byte, and a "front," or light byte. Basically, every frame is 2 monochrome binary images, with the first byte of the first one is followed by the first byte of the second one, so data is stored as follows :
FB(front buffer)[1],BB(back buffer)[1],FB[2],BB[2], etc...
Here's how the display works : (defining 0 as white and 3 as black, with 1 and 2 being in-between shades)
Each front buffer bit is worth 1, so if the front buffer were displayed with nothing in the back buffer, the "1" (or true) bits would show up as light gray pixels. These are then added to the back buffer bits, which are worth 2 (so if the back buffer were displayed with nothing in the front buffer, the "1" (or true) bits would show up as dark gray pixels) to get :"0" bit on either buffer = white pixel (0+0=0)
"1" bit on front buffer but not back buffer = light gray pixel (1+0=1)
"1" bit on back buffer but not front buffer = dark gray pixel (0+2=2)
"1" bit on both buffers = black pixel (1+2=3)
I have this down calculator-side, but I need to know : 1) How to convert the video to a specific framerate using the libs 2) How to convert these frames to 4-level grayscale at 160x100 pixels and 3) How to save these frames as raw data in the format I described. Thank you in advance for your answer(s).
-
Your guide to cookies, web analytics, and GDPR compliance