Recherche avancée

Sur d’autres sites (8889)

• I want to print HLS files using ffmpeg in aws lambda (python)

  14 avril 2021, par 최우선

  I implemented it through the link(https://aws.amazon.com/ko/blogs/media/processing-user-generated-content-using-aws-lambda-and-ffmpeg/) here, and it works well.

  


  s3_source_bucket = event['Records'][0]['s3']['bucket']['name']
s3_source_key = event['Records'][0]['s3']['object']['key']

s3_source_basename = os.path.splitext(os.path.basename(s3_source_key))[0]
s3_destination_filename = s3_source_basename + ".m3u8"

s3_client = boto3.client('s3')
s3_source_signed_url = s3_client.generate_presigned_url('get_object',
    Params={'Bucket': s3_source_bucket, 'Key': s3_source_key},
    ExpiresIn=SIGNED_URL_TIMEOUT)


ffmpeg_cmd = "/opt/bin/ffmpeg -i \"" + s3_source_signed_url + "\" -codec: copy -start_number 0 -hls_time 10 -hls_list_size 0 -f hls -"
command1 = shlex.split(ffmpeg_cmd)
p1 = subprocess.run(command1, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)

resp = s3_client.put_object(Body=p1.stdout, Bucket=S3_DESTINATION_BUCKET, Key=s3_destination_filename)


  


  However, the actual output through ffmpeg is multiple files. For example test.m3u8, test0.ts, test1.ts .....

  


  But when I print p1.stdout, it looks like multiple files (test.m3u8,test0.ts....) are merged into one file.

  


  Is there a way to get the actual output multiple files (test.m3u8,test0.ts......) from p1.stdout ? Please help.

  


• Using ffmpeg to assemble images from S3 into a video

  10 juillet 2020, par Mass Dot Net

  I can easily assemble images from local disk into a video using ffmpeg and passing a %06d filespec. Here's what a typical (pseudocode) command would look like :

  


  ffmpeg.exe -hide_banner -y -r 60 -t 12 -i /JpgsToCombine/%06d.JPG <..etc..>


  


  However, I'm struggling to do the same with images stored in AWS S3, without using some third party software to mount a virtual drive (e.g. TNTDrive). The S3 folder containing our images is too large to download to the 20GB ephemeral storage provided for AWS containers, and we're trying to avoid EFS because we'd have to provision expensive bandwidth.

  


  Here's what the HTTP and S3 URLs to each of our JPGs looks like :

  


  # HTTP URL
https://massdotnet.s3.amazonaws.com/jpgs-to-combine/000000.JPG # frame 0
https://massdotnet.s3.amazonaws.com/jpgs-to-combine/000012.JPG # frame 12
https://massdotnet.s3.amazonaws.com/jpgs-to-combine/000123.JPG # frame 123
https://massdotnet.s3.amazonaws.com/jpgs-to-combine/456789.JPG # frame 456789

# S3 URL
s3://massdotnet/jpgs-to-combine/000000.JPG # frame 0
s3://massdotnet/jpgs-to-combine/000012.JPG # frame 12
s3://massdotnet/jpgs-to-combine/000123.JPG # frame 123
s3://massdotnet/jpgs-to-combine/456789.JPG # frame 456789


  


  Is there any way to get ffmpeg to assemble these ? We could generate a signed URL for each S3 file, and put several thousand of those URLs onto a command line with an FFMPEG concat filter. However, we'd run up into the command line input limit in Linux at some point using this approach. I'm hoping there's a better way...

  


• AWS Lambda : "Unzipped size must be smaller than 106534017 bytes" after adding single file

  17 septembre 2023, par leon

  When trying to deploy my lambdas using AWS through the serverless framework I had no problems until I tried adding the ffmpeg binary.

  


  Now the ffmpeg binaries I have tried to add have ranged from 26 mb to 50 mb. Whichever I add, I get the following error :

  


  UPDATE_FAILED: WhatsappDocumentHandlerLambdaFunction (AWS::Lambda::Function)
Resource handler returned message: "Unzipped size must be smaller than 106534017 bytes (Service: Lambda, Status Code: 400, Request ID: ...)" (RequestToken: ..., HandlerErrorCode: InvalidRequest)


  


  The problem is that I did not add the file to this function. I added it to a completely different one.

  


  I have tried the following things :

  


  

  • Creating an "empty" function that only contains the ffmpeg binary and a function handler

  


  • Creating a layer that only contains the ffmpeg binary

  


  • Deleting the ffmpeg binary (the error goes away and deployment succeeds

  


  • Varying sizes of ffmpeg binaries between 26 and 50mb

  


  • Getting the ffmpeg-lambda-layer (https://github.com/serverlesspub/ffmpeg-aws-lambda-layer ; https://serverlessrepo.aws.amazon.com/applications/us-east-1/145266761615/ffmpeg-lambda-layer) and deploying it myself

  


  


  When trying every single one of these options I get the UPDATE_FAILED error in a different function that surely is not too big.

  


  I know I can deploy using a docker image but why complicate things with docker images when it should work ?

  


  I am very thankful for any ideas.