Recherche avancée

Sur d’autres sites (5488)

• Saving scatterplot animations with matplotlib produces blank video file

  1er avril 2013, par user2175850

  I am having a very similar problem to this question

  but the suggested solution doesn't work for me.

  I have set up an animated scatter plot using the matplotlib animation module. This works fine when it is displaying live. I would like to save it to an avi file or something similar. The code I have written to do this does not error out but the video it produces just shows a blank set of axes or a black screen. I've done several checks and the data is being run and figure updated it's just not getting saved to video...

  I tried removing "animated=True" and "blit=True" as suggested in this question but that did not fix the problem.

  I have placed the relevant code below but can provide more if necessary. Could anyone suggest what I should do to get this working ?

  def initAnimation(self):
  
          rs, cfgs = next(self.jumpingDataStreamIterator)     
  
          #self.scat = self.axAnimation.scatter(rs[0], rs[1], c=cfgs[0], marker='o')
  
          self.scat = self.axAnimation.scatter(rs[0], rs[1], c=cfgs[0], marker='o', animated=True)
  
          return self.scat,
  
  
  
  
  
  def updateAnimation(self, i):
  
      """Update the scatter plot."""
  
      rs, cfgs = next(self.jumpingDataStreamIterator)
  
      # Set x and y data...
  
      self.scat.set_offsets(rs[:2,].transpose()) 
  
      #self.scat = self.axAnimation.scatter(rs[0], rs[1], c=cfgs[0], animated=True)
  
      # Set sizes...
  
      #self.scat._sizes = 300 * abs(data[2])**1.5 + 100
  
      # Set colors..
  
      #self.scat.set_array(cfgs[0])
  
      # We need to return the updated artist for FuncAnimation to draw..
  
      # Note that it expects a sequence of artists, thus the trailing comma.
  
      matplotlib.pyplot.draw()
  
      return self.scat,
  
  
  
  def animate2d(self, steps=None, showEvery=50, size = 25):
  
      self.figAnimation, self.axAnimation = matplotlib.pyplot.subplots()
  
      self.axAnimation.set_aspect("equal")
  
      self.axAnimation.axis([-size, size, -size, size])
  
      self.jumpingDataStreamIterator = self.jumpingDataStream(showEvery)
  
  
  
      self.univeseAnimation = matplotlib.animation.FuncAnimation(self.figAnimation, 
  
                              self.updateAnimation, init_func=self.initAnimation,
  
                              blit=True)
  
      matplotlib.pyplot.show()
  
  
  
  def animate2dVideo(self,fileName=None, steps=10000, showEvery=50, size=25):
  
      self.figAnimation, self.axAnimation = matplotlib.pyplot.subplots()
  
      self.axAnimation.set_aspect("equal")
  
      self.axAnimation.axis([-size, size, -size, size])
  
      self.Writer = matplotlib.animation.writers['ffmpeg']
  
      self.writer = self.Writer(fps=1, metadata=dict(artist='Universe Simulation'))
  
      self.jumpingDataStreamIterator = self.jumpingDataStream(showEvery)
  
  
  
      self.universeAnimation = matplotlib.animation.FuncAnimation(self.figAnimation, 
  
                              self.updateAnimation, scipy.arange(1, 25), init_func=self.initAnimation)
  
  
  
      self.universeAnimation.save('C:/universeAnimation.mp4', writer = self.writer)

• Neutral net or neutered

  4 juin 2013, par Mans — Law and liberty

  In recent weeks, a number of high-profile events, in the UK and elsewhere, have been quickly seized upon to promote a variety of schemes for monitoring or filtering Internet access. These proposals, despite their good intentions of protecting children or fighting terrorism, pose a serious threat to fundamental liberties. Although at a glance the ideas may seem like a reasonable price to pay for the prevention of some truly hideous crimes, there is more than first meets the eye. Internet regulation in any form whatsoever is the thin end of a wedge at whose other end we find severely restricted freedom of expression of the kind usually associated with oppressive dictatorships. Where the Internet was once a novelty, it now forms an integrated part of modern society ; regulating the Internet means regulating our lives.

  Terrorism

  Following the brutal murder of British soldier Lee Rigby in Woolwich, attempts were made in the UK to revive the controversial Communications Data Bill, also dubbed the snooper’s charter. The bill would give police and security services unfettered access to details (excluding content) of all digital communication in the UK without needing so much as a warrant.

  The powers afforded by the snooper’s charter would, the argument goes, enable police to prevent crimes such as the one witnessed in Woolwich. True or not, the proposal would, if implemented, also bring about infrastructure for snooping on anyone at any time for any purpose. Once available, the temptation may become strong to extend, little by little, the legal use of these abilities to cover ever more everyday activities, all in the name of crime prevention, of course.

  In the emotional aftermath of a gruesome act, anything with the promise of preventing it happening again may seem like a good idea. At times like these it is important, more than ever, to remain rational and carefully consider all the potential consequences of legislation, not only the intended ones.

  Hate speech

  Hand in hand with terrorism goes hate speech, preachings designed to inspire violence against people of some singled-out nation, race, or other group. Naturally, hate speech is often to be found on the Internet, where it can reach large audiences while the author remains relatively protected. Naturally, we would prefer for it not to exist.

  To fulfil the utopian desire of a clean Internet, some advocate mandatory filtering by Internet service providers and search engines to remove this unwanted content. Exactly how such censoring might be implemented is however rarely dwelt upon, much less the consequences inadvertent blocking of innocent material might have.

  Pornography

  Another common target of calls for filtering is pornography. While few object to the blocking of child pornography, at least in principle, the debate runs hotter when it comes to the legal variety. Pornography, it is claimed, promotes violence towards women and is immoral or generally offensive. As such it ought to be blocked in the name of the greater good.

  The conviction last week of paedophile Mark Bridger for the abduction and murder of five-year-old April Jones renewed the debate about filtering of pornography in the UK ; his laptop was found to contain child pornography. John Carr of the UK government’s Council on Child Internet Safety went so far as suggesting a default blocking of all pornography, access being granted to an Internet user only once he or she had registered with some unspecified entity. Registering people wishing only to access perfectly legal material is not something we do in a democracy.

  The reality is that Google and other major search engines already remove illegal images from search results and report them to the appropriate authorities. In the UK, the Internet Watch Foundation, a non-government organisation, maintains a blacklist of what it deems ‘potentially criminal’ content, and many Internet service providers block access based on this list.

  While well-intentioned, the IWF and its blacklist should raise some concerns. Firstly, a vigilante organisation operating in secret and with no government oversight acting as the nation’s morality police has serious implications for freedom of speech. Secondly, the blocks imposed are sometimes more far-reaching than intended. In one incident, an attempt to block the cover image of the Scorpions album Virgin Killer hosted by Wikipedia (in itself a dubious decision) rendered the entire related article inaccessible as well as interfered with editing.

  Net neutrality

  Content filtering, or more precisely the lack thereof, is central to the concept of net neutrality. Usually discussed in the context of Internet service providers, this is the principle that the user should have equal, unfiltered access to all content. As a consequence, ISPs should not be held responsible for the content they deliver. Compare this to how the postal system works.

  The current debate shows that the principle of net neutrality is important not only at the ISP level, but should also include providers of essential services on the Internet. This means search engines should not be responsible for or be required to filter results, email hosts should not be required to scan users’ messages, and so on. No mandatory censoring can be effective without infringing the essential liberties of freedom of speech and press.

  Social networks operate in a less well-defined space. They are clearly not part of the essential Internet infrastructure, and they require that users sign up and agree to their terms and conditions. Because of this, they can include restrictions that would be unacceptable for the Internet as a whole. At the same time, social networks are growing in importance as means of communication between people, and as such they have a moral obligation to act fairly and apply their rules in a transparent manner.

  Facebook was recently under fire, accused of not taking sufficient measures to curb ‘hate speech,’ particularly against women. Eventually they pledged to review their policies and methods, and reducing the proliferation of such content will surely make the web a better place. Nevertheless, one must ask how Facebook (or another social network) might react to similar pressure from, say, a religious group demanding removal of ‘blasphemous’ content. What about demands from a foreign government ? Only yesterday, the Turkish prime minister Erdogan branded Twitter ‘a plague’ in a TV interview.

  Rather than impose upon Internet companies the burden of law enforcement, we should provide them the latitude to set their own policies as well as the legal confidence to stand firm in the face of unreasonable demands. The usual market forces will promote those acting responsibly.

  Further reading

  • Tory-Labour pact could save data bill, says Lord Howard
  • Internet companies warn May over ‘snooper’s charter’
  • Snooper’s charter ‘should be replaced by strengthening of existing powers’
  • Exclusive : ‘Snooper’s charter’ would not have prevented Woolwich attack, says MI5
  • Search engines urged to block more online porn sites
  • Why technology must be the solution to child abuse material online
  • Google must take more action to police explicit content, says Vince Cable
  • Facebook bows to campaign groups over ‘hate speech’
  • Facebook sexism campaign attracts thousands online
  • Türkischer Ministerpräsident : Twitter ist eine Plage
  • Valls : « La traque sur Internet doit être une priorité pour nous »
  • La Cnil, futur juge d’Internet
  • “National security matter” : Third agency caught unilaterally blocking web sites

• audio extracted from flv file via ffmpeg is of shorter duration than the actual flv video [closed]

  11 janvier 2013, par user1961143

  I have extracted audio from flv file via ffmpeg using this command :-

  ffmpeg -i 164_29.flv v19.mp3

  The flv videos duration is 3 minutes but the audio is of 2 mins 20 seconds only. On searching i found that the silent pieces of audio are removed when generating audio from ffmpeg. But i need the audio file to be of exactly same duration as flv video as later i need to put this audio in the flv video itself. Please help as this is urgent for our project. I am running the FFMpeg via .net windows service, so in case you know any other tool which can extract the audio of same duration as video and can be run via .net, it would be useful too.

  Console output :

  C :\Users\ritika.thakur>ffmpeg -i 164_29.flv v19.mp3
  ffmpeg version N-47062-g26c531c Copyright (c) 2000-2012 the FFmpeg developers
  built on Nov 25 2012 12:23:20 with gcc 4.7.2 (GCC)
  configuration : —disable-static —enable-shared —enable-gpl —enable-version —disable-pthreads —enable-runtime-cpudetect —enable-avisynth —enable-bzlib —enable-frei0r —enable-libass —enable-libopencore-amrnb —enable-libopencore-amrwb —enable-libfreetype —enable-libgsm —enable-libmp3lame —enable-libnut -enable-libopenjpeg —enable-libopus —enable-librtmp —enable-libschroedinger -enable-libspeex —enable-libtheora —enable-libutvideo —enable-libvo-aacenc —enable-libvo-amrwbenc —enable-libvorbis —enable-libvpx —enable-libx264 —enale-libxavs —enable-libxvid —enable-zlib
  libavutil 52. 9.100 / 52. 9.100
  libavcodec 54. 77.100 / 54. 77.100
  libavformat 54. 37.100 / 54. 37.100
  libavdevice 54. 3.100 / 54. 3.100
  libavfilter 3. 23.102 / 3. 23.102
  libswscale 2. 1.102 / 2. 1.102
  libswresample 0. 17.101 / 0. 17.101
  libpostproc 52. 2.100 / 52. 2.100
  Input #0, flv, from '164_29.flv' :
  Metadata :
  canSeekToEnd : false
  createdby : FMS 4.0
  creationdate : Tue Jan 08 00:26:19 2013
  Duration : 00:03:04.08, start : 0.000000, bitrate : 283
  kb/s
  Stream #0:0 : Video : flv1, yuv420p, 320x240, 1k tbr, 1k tbn, 1k tbc
  Stream #0:1 : Audio : nellymoser, 22050 Hz, mono, flt
  Output #0, mp3, to 'v19.mp3' :
  Metadata :
  canSeekToEnd : false
  createdby : FMS 4.0
  creationdate : Tue Jan 08 00:26:19 2013
  TSSE : Lavf54.37.100
  Stream #0:0 : Audio : mp3, 22050 Hz, mono, fltp
  Stream mapping :
  Stream #0:1 -> #0:0 (nellymoser -> libmp3lame)
  Press [q] to stop, [?] for help
  size= 567kB time=00:03:04.13 bitrate= 25.2kbits/s video:0kB audio:567kB subtitle:0 global headers:0kB muxing overhead 0.051503%

  This is the output of console for both video and audio file separately :-

  Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7601]
  Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

  C :\Users\ritika.thakur>ffmpeg -i v19.mp3

  ffmpeg version N-47062-g26c531c Copyright (c) 2000-2012 the FFmpeg developers
  built on Nov 25 2012 12:23:20 with gcc 4.7.2 (GCC)
  configuration : —disable-static —enable-shared —enable-gpl —enable-version3
  —disable-pthreads —enable-runtime-cpudetect —enable-avisynth —enable-bzlib
  — enable-frei0r —enable-libass —enable-libopencore-amrnb —enable-libopencore-
  amrwb —enable-libfreetype —enable-libgsm —enable-libmp3lame —enable-libnut -
   enable-libopenjpeg —enable-libopus —enable-librtmp —enable-libschroedinger -
   enable-libspeex —enable-libtheora —enable-libutvideo —enable-libvo-aacenc —
  enable-libvo-amrwbenc —enable-libvorbis —enable-libvpx —enable-libx264 —enab
  le-libxavs —enable-libxvid —enable-zlib
  libavutil 52. 9.100 / 52. 9.100
  libavcodec 54. 77.100 / 54. 77.100
  libavformat 54. 37.100 / 54. 37.100
  libavdevice 54. 3.100 / 54. 3.100
  libavfilter 3. 23.102 / 3. 23.102
  libswscale 2. 1.102 / 2. 1.102
  libswresample 0. 17.101 / 0. 17.101
  libpostproc 52. 2.100 / 52. 2.100
  [mp3 @ 0056e780] max_analyze_duration 5000000 reached at 5015510
  Input #0, mp3, from 'v19.mp3' :
  Metadata :
  canSeekToEnd : false
  createdby : FMS 4.0
  creationdate : Tue Jan 08 00:26:19 2013
  encoder : Lavf54.37.100
  Duration : 00:02:25.14, start : 0.000000, bitrate : 32 kb/s
  Stream #0:0 : Audio : mp3, 22050 Hz, mono, s16, 32 kb/s
  At least one output file must be specified

  C :\Users\ritika.thakur>ffmpeg -i 164_29.flv

  ffmpeg version N-47062-g26c531c Copyright (c) 2000-2012 the FFmpeg developers
  built on Nov 25 2012 12:23:20 with gcc 4.7.2 (GCC)
  configuration : —disable-static —enable-shared —enable-gpl —enable-version3
  —disable-pthreads —enable-runtime-cpudetect —enable-avisynth —enable-bzlib
  — enable-frei0r —enable-libass —enable-libopencore-amrnb —enable-libopencore-
  amrwb —enable-libfreetype —enable-libgsm —enable-libmp3lame —enable-libnut -
   enable-libopenjpeg —enable-libopus —enable-librtmp —enable-libschroedinger -
   enable-libspeex —enable-libtheora —enable-libutvideo —enable-libvo-aacenc —
  enable-libvo-amrwbenc —enable-libvorbis —enable-libvpx —enable-libx264 —enab
  le-libxavs —enable-libxvid —enable-zlib
  libavutil 52. 9.100 / 52. 9.100
  libavcodec 54. 77.100 / 54. 77.100
  libavformat 54. 37.100 / 54. 37.100
  libavdevice 54. 3.100 / 54. 3.100
  libavfilter 3. 23.102 / 3. 23.102
  libswscale 2. 1.102 / 2. 1.102
  libswresample 0. 17.101 / 0. 17.101
  libpostproc 52. 2.100 / 52. 2.100
  Input #0, flv, from '164_29.flv' :
  Metadata :
  canSeekToEnd : false
  createdby : FMS 4.0
  creationdate : Tue Jan 08 00:26:19 2013
  Duration : 00:03:04.08, start : 0.000000, bitrate : 283 kb/s
  Stream #0:0 : Video : flv1, yuv420p, 320x240, 1k tbr, 1k tbn, 1k tbc
  Stream #0:1 : Audio : nellymoser, 22050 Hz, mono, flt
  At least one output file must be specified

  If you see the duration of video is of 3:04 but audio extracted from it is of 2:25 only.
  Actually i am using ffmpeg overlay to show two videos side by side in our debate project for the client. Now ffmpeg takes audio from first video by default. But we want the audio from both videos together as a debate going on. Hence I thought of a solution to extract audio from both videos and merge them and than apply them to the overlayed video. This will all work perfectly only if I get the complete audio from the video file i.e. of equal duration.
  For more information i am writing here the overlay command we are using :-

   **ffmpeg -i 164_29.flv  -vf "[in] scale=359:320, pad=2*iw+6:ih
  
    [left];    movie=164_30.flv, scale=359:320 [right]; [left][right] 
  
    overlay=365:0  [out]" -b:v 3600k -y a1.flv**
  
  
  
   **This is the console output of this overlay command:-**

  C :\Users\ritika.thakur>ffmpeg -i 164_29.flv -vf "[in] scale=359:320, pad=2*iw+6
  :ih [left] ; movie=164_30.flv, scale=359:320 [right] ; [left][right] overlay=365:0
  [out]" -b:v 3600k -y a1.flv
  ffmpeg version N-47062-g26c531c Copyright (c) 2000-2012 the FFmpeg developers
  built on Nov 25 2012 12:23:20 with gcc 4.7.2 (GCC)
  configuration : —disable-static —enable-shared —enable-gpl —enable-version3
  —disable- pthreads —enable-runtime-cpudetect —enable- avisynth
  —enable-bzlib —enable
  -frei0r
  —enable-libass —enable-libopencore-amrnb —enable-libopencore-amrwb
  —enable- libfreetype —enable-libgsm —enable-libmp3lame —enable-libnut
  —enable-libopenjpeg —enable-libopus —enable-librtmp —enable-libschroedinger
  — enable-
  libspeex —enable-libtheora —enable- libutvideo
  —enable-libvo-aacenc —
  enable-libvo-amrwbenc —enable-libvorbis —enable-libvpx
  —enable-libx264 —enab
  le-libxavs —enable-libxvid —enable-zlib
  libavutil 52. 9.100 / 52. 9.100
  libavcodec 54. 77.100 / 54. 77.100
  libavformat 54. 37.100 / 54. 37.100
  libavdevice 54. 3.100 / 54. 3.100
  libavfilter 3. 23.102 / 3. 23.102
  libswscale 2. 1.102 / 2. 1.102
  libswresample 0. 17.101 / 0. 17.101
  libpostproc 52. 2.100 / 52. 2.100
  Input #0, flv, from '164_29.flv' :
  Metadata :
  canSeekToEnd : false
  createdby : FMS 4.0
  creationdate : Tue Jan 08 00:26:19 2013
  Duration : 00:03:04.08, start : 0.000000, bitrate : 283 kb/s
  Stream #0:0 : Video : flv1, yuv420p, 320x240, 1k tbr, 1k tbn, 1k tbc
  Stream #0:1 : Audio : nellymoser, 22050 Hz, mono, flt
  Output #0, flv, to 'a1.flv' :
  Metadata :
  canSeekToEnd : false
  createdby : FMS 4.0
  creationdate : Tue Jan 08 00:26:19 2013
  encoder : Lavf54.37.100
  Stream #0:0 : Video : flv1 ([2][0][0][0] / 0x0002), yuv420p, 724x320, q=2-31,
  3600 kb/s, 1k tbn, 1k tbc
  Stream #0:1 : Audio : mp3 ([2][0][0][0] / 0x0002), 22050 Hz, mono, fltp
  Stream mapping :
  Stream #0:0 -> #0:0 (flv -> flv)
  Stream #0:1 -> #0:1 (nellymoser -> libmp3lame)
  Press [q] to stop, [?] for help
  frame= 83 fps=0.0 q=4.1 size= 343kB time=00:00:07.01 bitrate= 401.2kbits/s
  frame= 149 fps=149 q=2.3 size= 861kB time=00:00:14.87 bitrate= 473.9kbits/s
  frame= 223 fps=148 q=2.0 size= 1492kB time=00:00:22.00 bitrate= 555.4kbits/s
  frame= 308 fps=153 q=2.0 size= 2195kB time=00:00:28.64 bitrate= 627.8kbits/s
  frame= 391 fps=156 q=2.0 size= 2858kB time=00:00:34.06 bitrate= 687.4kbits/s
  frame= 478 fps=159 q=2.0 size= 3541kB time=00:00:39.55 bitrate= 733.4kbits/s
  frame= 547 fps=156 q=2.0 size= 4293kB time=00:00:46.80 bitrate= 751.5kbits/s
  frame= 645 fps=161 q=2.0 size= 4896kB time=00:00:51.63 bitrate= 776.8kbits/s
  Buffer queue overflow, dropping.
  [Parsed_overlay_4 @ 0152ca80] Buffer queue overflow, dropping.
  Last message repeated 16 times
  frame= 731 fps=162 q=2.0 size= 5418kB time=00:00:56.61 bitrate= 784.0kbits/s
  Buffer queue overflow, dropping.
  [Parsed_overlay_4 @ 0152ca80] Buffer queue overflow, dropping.
  Last message repeated 49 times
  frame= 794 fps=158 q=2.0 size= 5802kB time=00:01:02.37 bitrate= 762.1kbits/s
  frame= 886 fps=160 q=2.0 size= 6363kB time=00:01:07.00 bitrate= 778.0kbits/s
  Buffer queue overflow, dropping.
  [Parsed_overlay_4 @ 0152ca80] Buffer queue overflow, dropping.
  Last message repeated 29 times
  frame= 954 fps=158 q=2.0 size= 6785kB time=00:01:13.31 bitrate= 758.2kbits/s
  frame= 1056 fps=162 q=2.0 size= 7377kB time=00:01:16.94 bitrate= 785.4kbits/s
  Buffer queue overflow, dropping.
  [Parsed_overlay_4 @ 0152ca80] Buffer queue overflow, dropping.
  Last message repeated 30 times
  frame= 1130 fps=161 q=2.0 size= 7789kB time=00:01:22.19 bitrate= 776.3kbits/s
  frame= 1217 fps=162 q=2.0 size= 8372kB time=00:01:27.68 bitrate= 782.1kbits/s
  frame= 1306 fps=163 q=2.0 size= 9074kB time=00:01:32.86 bitrate= 800.5kbits/s
  frame= 1393 fps=163 q=1.6 size= 9700kB time=00:01:38.41 bitrate= 807.3kbits/s
  frame= 1475 fps=163 q=2.0 size= 10278kB time=00:01:44.03 bitrate= 809.4kbits/s
  frame= 1568 fps=164 q=2.0 size= 10825kB time=00:01:48.52 bitrate= 817.1kbits/s
  frame= 1658 fps=165 q=2.0 size= 11439kB time=00:01:53.44 bitrate= 826.0kbits/s
  frame= 1734 fps=165 q=2.0 size= 12027kB time=00:01:58.31 bitrate= 832.7kbits/s
  frame= 1792 fps=162 q=2.0 size= 12579kB time=00:02:03.41 bitrate= 835.0kbits/s
  frame= 1851 fps=160 q=2.0 size= 13284kB time=00:02:10.74 bitrate= 832.3kbits/s
  frame= 1929 fps=160 q=2.0 size= 13922kB time=00:02:16.85 bitrate= 833.3kbits/s
  frame= 2010 fps=160 q=2.0 size= 14652kB time=00:02:23.39 bitrate= 837.1kbits/s
  frame= 2102 fps=161 q=2.0 size= 15329kB time=00:02:28.86 bitrate= 843.6kbits/s
  frame= 2200 fps=162 q=2.0 size= 15963kB time=00:02:34.08 bitrate= 848.7kbits/s
  frame= 2292 fps=163 q=2.0 size= 16554kB time=00:02:38.96 bitrate= 853.1kbits/s
  frame= 2378 fps=163 q=2.0 size= 17157kB time=00:02:44.50 bitrate= 854.4kbits/s
  frame= 2468 fps=164 q=2.0 size= 17826kB time=00:02:49.50 bitrate= 861.5kbits/s
  frame= 2564 fps=165 q=2.0 size= 18489kB time=00:02:54.43 bitrate= 868.3kbits/s
  Buffer queue overflow, dropping.
  [Parsed_overlay_4 @ 0152ca80] Buffer queue overflow, dropping.
  Last message repeated 15 times
  frame= 2647 fps=165 q=2.0 size= 19079kB time=00:02:59.53 bitrate= 870.6kbits/s
  frame= 2728 fps=165 q=2.0 Lsize= 19703kB time=00:03:04.13 bitrate= 876.6kbits/
  s video:19006kB audio:567kB subtitle:0 global headers:0kB muxing overhead 0.663315%

  Everything is working fine except that we want audio from both videos playing together in final overlayed file. I would be highly grateful if you can help in this and let me know if its possible to do via ffmpeg or not.