Recherche avancée

Médias (91)

Autres articles (50)

  • La sauvegarde automatique de canaux SPIP

    1er avril 2010, par

    Dans le cadre de la mise en place d’une plateforme ouverte, il est important pour les hébergeurs de pouvoir disposer de sauvegardes assez régulières pour parer à tout problème éventuel.
    Pour réaliser cette tâche on se base sur deux plugins SPIP : Saveauto qui permet une sauvegarde régulière de la base de donnée sous la forme d’un dump mysql (utilisable dans phpmyadmin) mes_fichiers_2 qui permet de réaliser une archive au format zip des données importantes du site (les documents, les éléments (...)

  • Contribute to a better visual interface

    13 avril 2011

    MediaSPIP is based on a system of themes and templates. Templates define the placement of information on the page, and can be adapted to a wide range of uses. Themes define the overall graphic appearance of the site.
    Anyone can submit a new graphic theme or template and make it available to the MediaSPIP community.

  • Submit bugs and patches

    13 avril 2011

    Unfortunately a software is never perfect.
    If you think you have found a bug, report it using our ticket system. Please to help us to fix it by providing the following information : the browser you are using, including the exact version as precise an explanation as possible of the problem if possible, the steps taken resulting in the problem a link to the site / page in question
    If you think you have solved the bug, fill in a ticket and attach to it a corrective patch.
    You may also (...)

Sur d’autres sites (7171)

  • Open letter to the European Parliament’s LIBE committee

    28 novembre 2019, par Joselyn Khor — Uncategorized

    An open letter to the European Parliament’s LIBE committee

    e-evidence newsletter

    In an effort to stem the tide of external control over user privacy, Matomo has rallied with other like-minded companies like Protonmail, NextCloud, Tutanota and Mailfence, to advocate for pro-privacy changes to the European Commission’s “e-evidence” proposal.

    Excerpt from the letter : 

    “The Commission’s e-evidence proposal threatens the competitive advantage European tech businesses have over their American counterparts by undermining the protections we can provide to our customers. It breaks with the long-standing rule that only trusted national judicial authorities can order companies to hand over customer data for criminal investigations. Instead, the Commission’s e-evidence proposal would allow any foreign law enforcement agency from across the EU to force us to hand out customer data without our own authorities doublechecking the foreign order.

    “Different from American Big Tech firms, European privacy tech companies lack the resources to verify the legality of each foreign order. Because of the way the e-evidence proposal is phrased, we would not even be able to properly authenticate foreign authorities to ensure that we are not replying to a malicious actor – let alone object to an order if we found it to be unwarranted.”

    Matomo Founder, Matthieu Aubry emphasises, “It is time that privacy-minded tech companies work together to defend their users, their businesses, and the values they are founded on. This is why we are supporting Privacy Tech Europe.”

    Read our open letter to members of the LIBE Committee in full.

  • ffmpeg difference when using -lavfi or -filter_complex

    25 mai 2020, par Luiz Cieslak

    I've started to use ffmpeg recently. I have been using only the -filter_complex flag to apply filters. I stumbled upon this SO question :

    



    FFmpeg : How to convert horizontal video 16:9 to vertical video 9:16, with blurred background on top and bottom sides

    



    A ffmpeg maintainer answers it using the -lavfi flag :

    



    ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -lavfi "[0:v]scale=iw:2*trunc(iw*16/18),boxblur=luma_radius=min(h\,w)/20:luma_power=1:chroma_radius=min(cw\,ch)/20:chroma_power=1[bg];[bg][0:v]overlay=(W-w)/2:(H-h)/2,setsar=1" output.mp4

    



    I tried to change -lavfi flag to -filter_complex :

    



    ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -filter_complex "[0:v]scale=iw:2*trunc(iw*16/18),boxblur=luma_radius=min(h\,w)/20:luma_power=1:chroma_radius=min(cw\,ch)/20:chroma_power=1[bg];[bg][0:v]overlay=(W-w)/2:(H-h)/2,setsar=1" output.mp4

    



    The result is the same and didn't notice a perf change.

    



    Is there a difference when using either flags ?

    


  • Anomalie #2381 : Corriger le niveau d’intertitre

    9 juin 2018, par nico d_

    Je sais pas, ça ne me choque pas trop non plus.
    Sinon un

     ? C’est pas top pour le "séparer" sémantiquement du contenu de l’article.

    On peut trouver autre chose de plus sémantique en html5, en faisant une section, mais là c’est les gros travaux (ou pas ?)

Navigation