
Recherche avancée
Médias (1)
-
MediaSPIP Simple : futur thème graphique par défaut ?
26 septembre 2013, par
Mis à jour : Octobre 2013
Langue : français
Type : Video
Autres articles (55)
-
List of compatible distributions
26 avril 2011, parThe table below is the list of Linux distributions compatible with the automated installation script of MediaSPIP. Distribution nameVersion nameVersion number Debian Squeeze 6.x.x Debian Weezy 7.x.x Debian Jessie 8.x.x Ubuntu The Precise Pangolin 12.04 LTS Ubuntu The Trusty Tahr 14.04
If you want to help us improve this list, you can provide us access to a machine whose distribution is not mentioned above or send the necessary fixes to add (...) -
Les autorisations surchargées par les plugins
27 avril 2010, parMediaspip core
autoriser_auteur_modifier() afin que les visiteurs soient capables de modifier leurs informations sur la page d’auteurs -
Creating farms of unique websites
13 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP platforms can be installed as a farm, with a single "core" hosted on a dedicated server and used by multiple websites.
This allows (among other things) : implementation costs to be shared between several different projects / individuals rapid deployment of multiple unique sites creation of groups of like-minded sites, making it possible to browse media in a more controlled and selective environment than the major "open" (...)
Sur d’autres sites (6026)
-
How to improve quality and latency in FFmpeg
3 août 2020, par AndrewI'm trying to stream FFmpeg over the new SRT protocol that's supported as an output. For now though, I'm sending it in the form of FFmpeg -> UDP -> SRT -> SRT -> UDP -> MPV/FFmpeg.


Somewhere along the line, the quality degrades sharply, and latency increases by quite a bit. This seemed to happen when adding audio. Meaning, if streaming just video, quality is decent and latency is low. If streaming just audio, quality is great but latency is high.


Not sure where I'm going wrong with this, so any help would be appreciated. The main focus points is high quality low latency.



Recording video through :


./ffmpeg.exe -rtbufsize 2147M -f dshow -i video="":audio="" -flush_packets 0 -preset medium -tune zerolatency -f mp4 -b:v 6M -g 30 -f mpegts udp://127.0.0.1:9001?pkt_size=1316



or


./ffmpeg.exe -f dshow -analyzeduration 200k -probesize 6M -i video="":audio="" -flush_packets 0 -preset fast -tune zerolatency -b:v 5M -b:a 384K -c:a libopus -g 25 -f mpegts udp://127.0.0.1:9001?pkt_size=1316




Then when taking it back at the receiver side, I use one of :


./ffmpeg.exe -i udp://127.0.0.1:9001 -c copy -bufsize 32M -f mpegts udp://127.0.0.1:9002?bitrate=26214400
./mpv.exe udp://127.0.0.1:9002



or


./mpv.exe --no-cache --untimed --no-demuxer-thread --video-sync=audio --vd-lavc-threads=1 udp://127.0.0.1:9002




What am I missing ? As is quality is generally terrible and latency can get up to 10 seconds. Is it just not possible with this set up ?


-
Merge commit ’715f139c9bd407ef7f4d1f564ad683140ec61e6d’
23 mars 2017, par Clément BœschMerge commit ’715f139c9bd407ef7f4d1f564ad683140ec61e6d’
* commit ’715f139c9bd407ef7f4d1f564ad683140ec61e6d’ : (23 commits)
vp9lpf/x86 : make filter_16_h work on 32-bit.
vp9lpf/x86 : make filter_48/84/88_h work on 32-bit.
vp9lpf/x86 : make filter_44_h work on 32-bit.
vp9lpf/x86 : make filter_16_v work on 32-bit.
vp9lpf/x86 : make filter_48/84_v work on 32-bit.
vp9lpf/x86 : make filter_88_v work on 32-bit.
vp9lpf/x86 : make filter_44_v work on 32-bit.
vp9lpf/x86 : save one register in SIGN_ADD/SUB.
vp9lpf/x86 : store unpacked intermediates for filter6/14 on stack.
vp9lpf/x86 : move variable assigned inside macro branch.
vp9lpf/x86 : simplify ABSSUM_CMP by inverting the comparison meaning.
vp9lpf/x86 : remove unused register from ABSSUB_CMP macro.
vp9lpf/x86 : slightly simplify 44/48/84/88 h stores.
vp9lpf/x86 : make cglobal statement more conservative in register allocation.
vp9lpf/x86 : save one register in loopfilter surface coverage.
vp9lpf/x86 : add ff_vp9_loop_filter_[vh]_44_16_sse2,ssse3,avx.
vp9lpf/x86 : add ff_vp9_loop_filter_h_48,84_16_sse2,ssse3,avx().
vp9lpf/x86 : add an SSE2 version of vp9_loop_filter_[vh]_88_16
vp9lpf/x86 : add ff_vp9_loop_filter_[vh]_88_16_ssse3,avx.
vp9lpf/x86 : add ff_vp9_loop_filter_[vh]_16_16_sse2().
...All these commits are cherry-picks from FFmpeg. Maybe some slight
differences sneaked in but the Libav codebase still differs too much
with our own to make a proper diff. This merge is a noop.Merged-by : Clément Bœsch <u@pkh.me>
-
setting bit rates in creating video from images in ffmpeg not working
2 mai 2014, par mast kalandarI have a HQ video of one second
Some information of this video is as below
Dimensions : 1920 x 1080
Codec : H.264
Framerate : 30 frames per second
Size : 684.7 kB (6,84,673 bytes)
Bitrates : 5458 kbpsI have extracted frames from video
ffmpeg -i f1.mp4 f%d.jpg
All images are of 1920 x 1020 pixels by default 30 frames are generated (f7_1.jpg, f7_2.jpg,.....,f7_30.jpg)
I have added some texts and objects to these images (without changing dimensions of any image, all 30 images are still of 1920 x 1020 pixels)
Now I am trying to merge all these images to create single video (of 1 second)
I referred this official document, I have run below command
ffmpeg -f image2 -i f7_%d.jpg -r 30 -b:v 5458k foo_5458_2.mp4
Video created is also of one second, thing is its bit rates are higher then the original one. New video has 6091 kbps bit rates, while I expect are 5458 kbps only.
Because of higher bits, its gets finish very quickly compare to original video in video player.
Is there any thing I missing ??
And I don’t know what is exact meaning and job of
-f image2
option, when I run command without this option, I am getting same video.