Recherche avancée

Sur d’autres sites (3859)

• ffmpeg converting .mkv to .264

  13 octobre 2015, par V. Panchenko

  I want to convert .mkv to .264.
  I try to do it using ffmpeg :

  ffmpeg -i input.mkv -vcodec copy -acodec copy output.264

  It works without errors, but when I try to play output.264 using ffplay :

  ffplay -f h264 -i output.264

  ffplay response is :

  ffplay version N-75924-gd25c033 Copyright (c) 2003-2015 the FFmpeg developers
  
    built with gcc 5.2.0 (GCC)
  
    configuration: --enable-gpl --enable-version3 --disable-w32threads --enable-av
  
  isynth --enable-bzlib --enable-fontconfig --enable-frei0r --enable-gnutls --enab
  
  le-iconv --enable-libass --enable-libbluray --enable-libbs2b --enable-libcaca --
  
  enable-libdcadec --enable-libfreetype --enable-libgme --enable-libgsm --enable-l
  
  ibilbc --enable-libmodplug --enable-libmp3lame --enable-libopencore-amrnb --enab
  
  le-libopencore-amrwb --enable-libopenjpeg --enable-libopus --enable-librtmp --en
  
  able-libschroedinger --enable-libsoxr --enable-libspeex --enable-libtheora --ena
  
  ble-libtwolame --enable-libvidstab --enable-libvo-aacenc --enable-libvo-amrwbenc
  
   --enable-libvorbis --enable-libvpx --enable-libwavpack --enable-libwebp --enabl
  
  e-libx264 --enable-libx265 --enable-libxavs --enable-libxvid --enable-lzma --ena
  
  ble-decklink --enable-zlib
  
    libavutil      55.  3.100 / 55.  3.100
  
    libavcodec     57.  5.100 / 57.  5.100
  
    libavformat    57.  3.100 / 57.  3.100
  
    libavdevice    57.  0.100 / 57.  0.100
  
    libavfilter     6. 11.100 /  6. 11.100
  
    libswscale      4.  0.100 /  4.  0.100
  
    libswresample   2.  0.100 /  2.  0.100
  
    libpostproc    54.  0.100 / 54.  0.100
  
  [h264 @ 03972220] sps_id 24 out of rangeq=    0KB sq=    0B f=0/0
  
  [h264 @ 03972220] missing picture in access unit with size 12836207
  
  [h264 @ 03972220] data partitioning is not implemented. Update your FFmpeg versi
  
  on to the newest one from Git. If the problem still occurs, it means that your f
  
  ile has a feature which has not been implemented.
  
  [h264 @ 03972220] If you want to help, upload a sample of this file to ftp://upl
  
  oad.ffmpeg.org/incoming/ and contact the ffmpeg-devel mailing list. (ffmpeg-deve
  
  l@ffmpeg.org)
  
  [h264 @ 03972220] data partitioning is not implemented. Update your FFmpeg versi
  
  on to the newest one from Git. If the problem still occurs, it means that your f
  
  ile has a feature which has not been implemented.
  
  [h264 @ 03972220] If you want to help, upload a sample of this file to ftp://upl
  
  oad.ffmpeg.org/incoming/ and contact the ffmpeg-devel mailing list. (ffmpeg-deve
  
  l@ffmpeg.org)
  
  [h264 @ 03972220] sps_id 24 out of range
  
  [h264 @ 03972220] data partitioning is not implemented. Update your FFmpeg versi
  
  on to the newest one from Git. If the problem still occurs, it means that your f
  
  ile has a feature which has not been implemented.
  
  [h264 @ 03972220] If you want to help, upload a sample of this file to ftp://upl
  
  oad.ffmpeg.org/incoming/ and contact the ffmpeg-devel mailing list. (ffmpeg-deve
  
  l@ffmpeg.org)
  
  [h264 @ 03972220] no frame!
  
  [h264 @ 039696e0] Stream #0: not enough frames to estimate rate; consider increa
  
  sing probesize
  
  [h264 @ 039696e0] decoding for stream 0 failed
  
  [h264 @ 039696e0] Could not find codec parameters for stream 0 (Video: h264, non
  
  e): unspecified size
  
  Consider increasing the value for the 'analyzeduration' and 'probesize' options
  
  Contagion.264: could not find codec parameters

  How I can fix it and convert .mkv to .264 correctly ?

• How to convert rtmp hevc video stream to srt av1 endpoint with ffmpeg ?

  20 juin 2024, par Lulík

  i want use ffmpeg to listen rtmp stream and send to srt endpoint.

  


  Flow : smartphone (camera) -> laptop (ffmpeg script) -> desktop (obs studio)

  


  ffmpeg script show warning message and in obs stuido i can see any video only audio.

  


  Thank you in advance.

  


  Console output while running script (error in the end is bcs i stoped sending data from phone) :

  


  ffmpeg version git-2024-06-20-8d6014d Copyright (c) 2000-2024 the FFmpeg developers
  built with gcc 12 (Debian 12.2.0-14)
  configuration: --enable-libsvtav1 --enable-libsrt
  libavutil      59. 24.100 / 59. 24.100
  libavcodec     61.  8.100 / 61.  8.100
  libavformat    61.  3.104 / 61.  3.104
  libavdevice    61.  2.100 / 61.  2.100
  libavfilter    10.  2.102 / 10.  2.102
  libswscale      8.  2.100 /  8.  2.100
  libswresample   5.  2.100 /  5.  2.100
Input #0, flv, from 'rtmp://192.168.0.194/s/streamKey':
  Duration: 00:00:00.00, start: 0.000000, bitrate: N/A
  Stream #0:0: Video: hevc (Main), yuv420p(tv, smpte170m/bt470bg/smpte170m), 1080x1920, 10240 kb/s, 30 fps, 120 tbr, 1k tbn
  Stream #0:1: Audio: aac (LC), 44100 Hz, stereo, fltp, 131 kb/s
Stream mapping:
  Stream #0:0 -> #0:0 (hevc (native) -> av1 (libsvtav1))
  Stream #0:1 -> #0:1 (aac (native) -> mp2 (native))
Press [q] to stop, [?] for help
Svt[info]: -------------------------------------------
Svt[info]: SVT [version]:   SVT-AV1 Encoder Lib 595a874
Svt[info]: SVT [build]  :   GCC 12.2.0   64 bit
Svt[info]: LIB Build date: Jun 20 2024 14:25:08
Svt[info]: -------------------------------------------
Svt[info]: Number of logical cores available: 12
Svt[info]: Number of PPCS 76
Svt[info]: [asm level on system : up to avx2]
Svt[info]: [asm level selected : up to avx2]
Svt[info]: -------------------------------------------
Svt[info]: SVT [config]: main profile   tier (auto) level (auto)
Svt[info]: SVT [config]: width / height / fps numerator / fps denominator       : 1080 / 1920 / 120 / 1
Svt[info]: SVT [config]: bit-depth / color format                   : 8 / YUV420
Svt[info]: SVT [config]: preset / tune / pred struct                    : 10 / PSNR / random access
Svt[info]: SVT [config]: gop size / mini-gop size / key-frame type          : 641 / 16 / key frame
Svt[info]: SVT [config]: BRC mode / rate factor                     : CRF / 35 
Svt[info]: SVT [config]: AQ mode / variance boost                   : 2 / 0
Svt[info]: -------------------------------------------
Svt[warn]: Failed to set thread priority: Invalid argument
Output #0, mpegts, to 'srt://192.168.0.167:9998?mode=caller':
  Metadata:
    encoder         : Lavf61.3.104
  Stream #0:0: Video: av1, yuv420p(tv, smpte170m/bt470bg/smpte170m, progressive), 1080x1920, q=2-31, 120 fps, 90k tbn
      Metadata:
        encoder         : Lavc61.8.100 libsvtav1
  Stream #0:1: Audio: mp2, 44100 Hz, stereo, s16, 384 kb/s
      Metadata:
        encoder         : Lavc61.8.100 mp2
[mpegts @ 0x55ec921d9540] Stream 0, codec av1, is muxed as a private data stream and may not be recognized upon reading.
[in#0/flv @ 0x55ec9219cc40] Error during demuxing: Input/output error1990.7kbits/s speed=0.967x    
[out#0/mpegts @ 0x55ec922247c0] video:4431KiB audio:1138KiB subtitle:0KiB other streams:0KiB global headers:0KiB muxing overhead: 6.374870%
frame=  723 fps= 31 q=35.0 Lsize=    5923KiB time=00:00:24.12 bitrate=2011.3kbits/s speed=1.04x


  


  I send video stream from mobile app over rtmp encoded with hevc to my laptop where running script ffmpeg -f flv -listen 1 -i rtmp://192.168.0.194/s/streamKey -c:v libsvtav1 -f mpegts srt://192.168.0.167:9998?mode=caller. On the desktop i have obs with media source input srt://192.168.0.167:9998?mode=listener.

  


  When i run ffmpeg script without video codec option (-c:v libsvtav1) its working fine and in obs i can see video from my phone camera. With the option i can not see video only audio.
I clearly dont understand warning message : [mpegts @ 0x55ec921d9540] Stream 0, codec av1, is muxed as a private data stream and may not be recognized upon reading..
Do I need specify codec (av1) in obs media source or my ffmpeg script is wrong ?

  


• Optical Drive Value Proposition

  28 août 2010, par Multimedia Mike — General

  I have the absolute worst luck in the optical drive department. Ever since I started building my own computers in 1995 — close to the beginning of the CD-ROM epoch — I have burned through a staggering number of optical drives. Seriously, especially in the time period between about 1995-1998, I was going through a new drive every 4-6 months or so. This was also during that CD-ROM speed race where the the drive packages kept advertising loftier ‘X’ speed ratings. I didn’t play a lot of CD-ROM games during that timeframe, though I did listen to quite a few audio CDs through the computer.

  
  
  

  I use “optical drive” as a general term to describe CD-ROM drives, CD-R/RW drives, DVD-ROM drives, DVD-R/RW drives, and drives capable of doing any combination of reading and writing CDs and DVDs. In my observation, optical media seems to be falling out of favor somewhat, giving way to online digital distribution for things like games and software, as well as flash drives and external hard drives vs. recordable or rewritable media for backup and sneakernet duty. Somewhere along the line, I started to buy computers that didn’t even have optical drives. That’s why I have purchased at least 2 external USB drives (seen in the picture above). I don’t have much confidence that either works correctly. My main desktop until recently, a Mac Mini, has an internal optical drive that grew flaky and unreliable a few months after the unit was purchased.

  I just have really rotten luck with optical drives. The most reliable drive in my house is the one on the headless machine that, until recently, was the main workhorse on the FATE farm. The eject switch didn’t work correctly so I have to log in remotely, 'sudo eject', walk to the other room, pop in the disc, walk back to the other room, and work with the disc.

  Maybe optical media is on its way out, but I still have many hundreds of CD-ROMs. Perhaps I should move forward on this brainstorm to archive all of my optical discs on hard drives (and then think of some data mining experiments, just for the academic appeal), before it’s too late ; optical discs don’t last forever.

  So if I needed a good optical drive, what should I consider ? I’ve always been the type to go cheap, I admit. Many of my optical drives were on the lower end of the cost spectrum, which might have played some role in their rapid replacement. However, I’m not sold on the idea that I’m getting quality just because I’m paying a higher price. That LG unit at the top of the pile up there was relatively pricey and still didn’t fare well in the long (or even medium) term.

  Come to think of it, I used to have a ridiculous stockpile of castoff (but somehow still functional) optical drives. So many, in fact, that in 2004 I had a full size PC tower that I filled with 4 working drives, just because I could. Okay, I admit that there was a period where I had some reliable drives.

  That might be an idea, actually– throw together such a computer for heavy duty archival purposes. I visited Weird Stuff Warehouse today (needed some PC100 RAM for an old machine and they came through) and I think I could put together such a box rather cheaply.

  It’s a dirty job, but… well, you know the rest.