Recherche avancée

Sur d’autres sites (3984)

• Compressing videos from a smartphone

  21 septembre 2019, par fejesjoco

  I have a Nexus 6p with the stock camera. It’s set to record at 1080p, 30fps. Here’s a 5 second sample (11 MB).

  Videos from this phone come out at about 17 Mbps on average. I tried to compress it with ffmpeg with -c:v libx264 -crf 23 -preset veryslow, the result comes out at about 5.5 MB, which is about 9 Mbps.

  I think this bitrate is a bit too much. When I look at torrent file listings, I can see high quality videos at 3 GB in size on average, and if such a movie is 90 minutes long on average, that is about 4-5 Mbps which sounds okay.

  I’m wondering, why the big difference ? I can notice that my video is noisy/grainy (which is expected from a phone), and that might reduce compressibility. I tried a few ffmpeg filters, like hqdn3d and atadenoise, but the noise mostly remained (maybe I didn’t play with it enough). Then I figured, the video is also shaky (which is also expected), and that might reduce compressibility too (and even makes temporal noise filtering less effective). I tried to stabilize it with the deshake filter, but that didn’t help either.

  I know I could just limit the bandwidth to whatever I like, but there must be a reason why ffmpeg thinks it needs a high bandwidth to maintain a certain quality, and a lower bandwidth would just decrease the quality.

  Why do these videos have such a high bitrate ? What’s the best way to compress them more while keeping or even increasing their quality ?

• avformat/matroskadec : Improve read error/EOF checks I

  25 juin 2019, par Andreas Rheinhardt

  avformat/matroskadec : Improve read error/EOF checks I
  ebml_read_num had a number of flaws :
  1. The check for read errors/EOF was totally wrong. E.g. an EBML number
  
  beginning with the invalid 0x00 would be considered a read error,
  
  although it is just invalid data.
  
  2. The check for read errors/EOF was done just once, after reading the
  
  first byte of the EBML number. But errors/EOF can happen inbetween, of
  
  course, and this wasn't checked.
  
  3. There was no way to distinguish when EOF should be an error (because
  
  the data has to be there) for which an error message should be emitted
  
  and when it is not necessarily an error (namely during parsing of EBML
  
  IDs). Such a possibility has been added and used.
  All this was fixed ; furthermore, the error messages for invalid EBML
  
  numbers were improved and useless initializations were removed.
  Signed-off-by : Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@gmail.com>
  

  • [DH] libavformat/matroskadec.c

• Compressing videos from a smartphone

  9 novembre 2016, par fejesjoco

  I have a Nexus 6p with the stock camera. It’s set to record at 1080p, 30fps. Here’s a 5 second sample (11 MB).

  Videos from this phone come out at about 17 Mbps on average. I tried to compress it with ffmpeg with -c:v libx264 -crf 23 -preset veryslow, the result comes out at about 5.5 MB, which is about 9 Mbps.

  I think this bitrate is a bit too much. When I look at torrent file listings, I can see high quality videos at 3 GB in size on average, and if such a movie is 90 minutes long on average, that is about 4-5 Mbps which sounds okay.

  I’m wondering, why the big difference ? I can notice that my video is noisy/grainy (which is expected from a phone), and that might reduce compressibility. I tried a few ffmpeg filters, like hqdn3d and atadenoise, but the noise mostly remained (maybe I didn’t play with it enough). Then I figured, the video is also shaky (which is also expected), and that might reduce compressibility too (and even makes temporal noise filtering less effective). I tried to stabilize it with the deshake filter, but that didn’t help either.

  I know I could just limit the bandwidth to whatever I like, but there must be a reason why ffmpeg thinks it needs a high bandwidth to maintain a certain quality, and a lower bandwidth would just decrease the quality.

  Why do these videos have such a high bitrate ? What’s the best way to compress them more while keeping or even increasing their quality ?