
Recherche avancée
Médias (1)
-
Bug de détection d’ogg
22 mars 2013, par
Mis à jour : Avril 2013
Langue : français
Type : Video
Autres articles (49)
-
Websites made with MediaSPIP
2 mai 2011, parThis page lists some websites based on MediaSPIP.
-
Creating farms of unique websites
13 avril 2011, parMediaSPIP platforms can be installed as a farm, with a single "core" hosted on a dedicated server and used by multiple websites.
This allows (among other things) : implementation costs to be shared between several different projects / individuals rapid deployment of multiple unique sites creation of groups of like-minded sites, making it possible to browse media in a more controlled and selective environment than the major "open" (...) -
Publier sur MédiaSpip
13 juin 2013Puis-je poster des contenus à partir d’une tablette Ipad ?
Oui, si votre Médiaspip installé est à la version 0.2 ou supérieure. Contacter au besoin l’administrateur de votre MédiaSpip pour le savoir
Sur d’autres sites (5612)
-
Looking for a multimedia SDK (open source or paid) which can play audio (.mp3, .aac) and video (.mp4 etc.)
8 avril 2022, par AhmadHI would like to embed audio (and video) files in my cross platform application.
Searching for an SDK with below functionality :


- 

- Play audio - .mp3,.aac (are must) & other common formats
- Play video - .mp4 & other common formats
- Audio recording would be an added advantage.
- Open source or affordable price










[ Note : FFmpeg is not an option due to some License restriction]


**Anything that has all FFmpeg properties would be ideal.


Looking online but haven't found any suitable option.
Please help.


-
ffmpeg difference when using -lavfi or -filter_complex
25 mai 2020, par Luiz CieslakI've started to use ffmpeg recently. I have been using only the -filter_complex flag to apply filters. I stumbled upon this SO question :






A ffmpeg maintainer answers it using the -lavfi flag :



ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -lavfi "[0:v]scale=iw:2*trunc(iw*16/18),boxblur=luma_radius=min(h\,w)/20:luma_power=1:chroma_radius=min(cw\,ch)/20:chroma_power=1[bg];[bg][0:v]overlay=(W-w)/2:(H-h)/2,setsar=1" output.mp4



I tried to change -lavfi flag to -filter_complex :



ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -filter_complex "[0:v]scale=iw:2*trunc(iw*16/18),boxblur=luma_radius=min(h\,w)/20:luma_power=1:chroma_radius=min(cw\,ch)/20:chroma_power=1[bg];[bg][0:v]overlay=(W-w)/2:(H-h)/2,setsar=1" output.mp4



The result is the same and didn't notice a perf change.



Is there a difference when using either flags ?


-
Evolution #4391 : Squelettes de la dist : améliorer le markup et passer à BEM
15 octobre 2019, par cy_altern -Un autre point à ajouter possiblement au cahier des charges : passer les CSS en mobile-first.
Donc partir sur des<span class="CodeRay"><span class="directive">@media</span> (<span class="type">min-width</span>: <span class="error">N</span><span class="error">p</span><span class="error">x</span>)</span>
au lieu de
<span class="CodeRay"><span class="directive">@media</span> (<span class="type">max-width</span>: <span class="error">N</span><span class="error">p</span><span class="error">x</span>)</span>
je plussois pour le mobile-first (et dans l’optique d’une dist "pédagogique" ça permet de privilégier une bonne pratique)