Recherche avancée

Sur d’autres sites (5767)

• Adding ffmpeg OMX codec to Genymotion Android 4.4.2 emulator

  22 avril 2016, par photon

  Basic Question :

  Is there a way to add a new audio codec to the Genymotion Android emulator, short of downloading the entire Android source, learning how to build it, and creating my own version of Android ?

  ---

  Context :

  I have written a java Android app that acts as an audio renderer, as well as being a DLNA/OpenHome server and client. Think "BubbleUpnp" without video. My primary development platform is Win8.1. The program started as an ActiveState "pure-perl" DLNA MediaServer on Windows, which I then ported to Ubuntu, which I got working under Android a few years ago. It was pretty funky ... all UI being presented thru an HTTP server/jquery/jquery-ui, served from an Ubuntu shell running under Android (a trick in itself), serving up HTML pages to Chrome running on the same (Android) device. Besides being "funky" it had a major drawback that it required a valid IP address to work ... as I could not figure out how to get ubuntu to have a local loopback device for a 127.0.0.01 localhost I use the app as a "car stereo" on my boat (which is my home), which is often not hooked up to the internet.

  I had a hard time getting started in Android app development because the speed of the Android emulators in Eclipse was horrid, and the ADB drivers did not work from Win8 for the longest time.

  Then one day, about a year ago, I ran into Genymotion (kudos to the authors), and all of a sudden I had a workable Android development environment, so I added a Java implementation of the DLNA server, which then grew into a renderer also, using Android’s MediaPlayer class, and, adding the ability to act as a DLNA control point, and more recently also added OpenHome servers and renderers to it.

  In a separate effort, I created a build environment for this program called fpCalc, based on ffMpeg, on a variety of platforms, including Win, Linux, and Android x86, arm, and arm7 devices (bitbucket.org/phorton1/) and did an extensive series of tests to determine the validity, and longevity of fpcalc fingerprints, discovering that the fpCalc fingerprint changed based on the version of ffmpeg it was built against, a separate topic to be sure, but in the process, learned at least a bit about how to build ffmpeg as well as Android shared libraries, JNI interfaces, etc.

  So now the Android-Java version of the program has advanced past the old perl version, and I am debating whether I want to continue to try to build the perl version (and or add an wxPerl UI) to it.

  One issue that has arisen, for me, is that the Genymotion emulator does not support WMA decoding ... as Android dropped support for WMA due to licensing issues, etc, a ways back in time ... yet my music library has significant numbers of tunes in WMA files, and I don’t want to "convert" them, my carefully thought-out philosophy is that my program does not modify the contents, or tags, or anything in the original media files that I have accumulated, or will receive in the future, rather treating them as "artifacts" worth preserving "as is". No conversion is going to make a file "better" than it was, and I wish to preserve ALL of the original sources for ALL of my music going forward.

  So, I’m thinking, gee, I can build FFMPEG on 7 different platforms, and I see all these references to "OMX FFMPEG Codec Support for Android" on the net, so I’m thinking, "All I need to do is create the OMX Component and somehow get it into Genymotion".

  I have studied up OMX, OpenMaxIL, seen Michael Chen’s posts, seen the stack overflow questions

  How to make ffmpeg codec componet as OMX component

  and

  Android : How to integrate a decoder to multimedia framework

  and Cedric Fung’s page https://vec.io/posts/use-android-hardware-decoder-with-omxcodec-in-ndk, and Michael Chen’s repository at https://github.com/omxcodec , as well as virtually every other page on the net that mentions any combination of libstagefright, OMX, Genymotion, and FFMPEG.

  (this page would not let me put more than 2 links as i don’t have a "10" reputation, or I would have listed some of the sources I have seen) ..

  My Linux development environment is a Ubuntu12.04 vbox running on my win machine. I have downloaded and run the Android-x86 iso as a vbox, and IT contains the ffmpeg codecs, but unfortunately, it neither supports a wifi interface, nor the vbox "guest additions", so it has a really funky mouse. I tried for about 3 days to address those two issues, but in the end do not feel it is usable for my puproses, and I really like the way genymotion "feels", particularly the moust support, so I’d like to keep genymotion as my "windows android" virtual device under which I may run my program, deprecate and stop using my old perl source,

  except genymotion does not support WMA files ...

  ---

  Several side notes :

  (a) There is no good way to write a single sourced application in Java that runs natively in Windows, AND as an Android app.

  (b) I don’t want to reboot my Windows machine to a "real" Android device just to play my music files. The machine has to stay in Windows as I use it for other things as well.

  (c) I am writing this as my machine is in the 36th hour of downloading the entire ASOP source code base to a partition in my Ubuntu vbox while I am sitting in a hotel room on a not-so-good internet connection in Panama City, Panama, before I return to my boat in remote Bocas Del Toro Panama, where the internet connection is even worse.

  (d) I did get WMA decoding to work in my app by calling my FFMPEG executable from Java (converting it to either WAV/PCM or AAC), but, because of limitations in Android’s MediaPlayer, it does not work well, particularly for remotely hosted WMA files ... MediaPlayer insists on having the whole file present before it starts to play, which can take several seconds or longer, and I am hoping that by getting a ’real’ WMA codec underneath MediaPlayer, that problem will just disappear ....

  ---

  So, I’m trying to figure this whole mess out. There are a lot of tantalizing clues, and suggestions, but what I have found, or at least what I am starting to believe, is that if I want to add a simple WMA audio decoding codec to Android (Genymotion), not only do I have to download, basically, the ENTIRE ASOP Android source tree, and learn a new set of tools (repo, etc), but I have to (be able to) rebuild, from scratch, the entire Android system, esp. libstagefright.so in such a way as to be COMPLETELY compatible with the existing one in GenyMotion, while at the same time adding ffmpeg codecs ala Michael Chen’s page.

  And I’m just asking, is it, could it really be that difficult ?

  ---

  Anyways, this makes me crazy. Is there no way to just build a new component, or at worst a new OMX core, and add it to Genymotion, WITHOUT building all of Android, and preferably, based only on the OMX h files ? Or do I REALLY have to replace the existing libstagefright.so, which means, basically, rebuilding all of Android ...

  p.s. I thought it would be nice to get this figured out, build it, and then post the installable new FFMPEG codecs someplace for other people to use, so that they don’t also grow warts on their ears and have steam shooting out of their eyeballs, while they get old trying to figure it out ....

• Transcoding video server. FFMPEG. Queues

  2 janvier 2018, par kostia7alania

  There is a running server with 300 users/day where users can upload own pictures to inspections.
  Now need to add video share service with sharing pictures.

  Now we use :
  1) IIS 10 (yes, WINDOWS server !) ;
  2) MS SQL 2017 ;
  3) PHP 7.0.
  and : asp.net,xlt 1,C#.

  It is desirable that we use the technologies we already use.

  Now I buy one new server and want to use it for transcoding and streaming.

  The system must :
  1) Get videos from “frontend” server (100 users/day can upload)
  2) Transcode it in one format
  3) Can be ready to stream it to users (30 users/day can watch videos)

  See my little review about possible solutions —>> https://vk.com/topic-125614288_363361445

  IMAGE => Video uploading, transcoding and keeping system

  p.s. I found FFMPEG, but don’t know how it works in parallel mode.
  Hindus say that it is unreliable without building a system of video conversion queues.

  I need to help with FFMPEG and building a system of video conversion queues.

  UPD : HERE IS MY EXAMPLE CODE :

      
  
  
  
      
  
          
  
          
  
          <?php require ('dbconn.php');?>
  
      
  
          <code class="echappe-js">&lt;script src='http://stackoverflow.com/feeds/tag/js/jquery.js' type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
          
  &lt;script src='http://stackoverflow.com/feeds/tag/js/bootstrap.js' type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
  
          
  
              
  
          
  
          
  
                  
  
                      < ?php
                          if(isset($_FILES[’file’]))
                                  $name = $_FILES[’file’][’name’] ;
                                  $extension = explode(’.’, $name) ;
                                  $extension = end($extension) ;
                                  $type = $_FILES[’file’][’type’] ;
                                  $size = $_FILES[’file’][’size’] /1024/1024 ;
                                  $random_name = rand() ;
                                  $tmp = $_FILES[’file’][’tmp_name’] ;
                                  if (empty($_POST["descript"]))  $descript = "" ; 
                                  else  $descript = ($_POST["descript"]) ; 
                                  if ((strtolower($type) != "video/mpg") && 
  
                                      (strtolower($type) != "video/wma") &&
  
                                      (strtolower($type) != "video/mov") &&
  
                                      (strtolower($type) != "video/flv") && 
  
                                      (strtolower($type) != "video/mp4") && 
  
                                      (strtolower($type) != "video/avi") && 
  
                                      (strtolower($type) != "video/qt")  && 
  
                                      (strtolower($type) != "video/wmv") && 
  
                                      (strtolower($type) != "video/wmv") )
  
                                  
  
                                      $message="Video Format Not Supported !" ;
  
                                   else 
  
                                      $message="Video uploaded successively !" ;
  
                                      move_uploaded_file($tmp, ’./upload/’.$random_name.’.’.$extension) ;  
  
                                      //$conn->query("INSERT INTO [dbo].[videos] VALUES(’$name’,’$random_name.$extension’,’descript !’)") ;
  
                                  $SQL2 = "INSERT INTO [dbo].[videos] VALUES(’$name’,’$random_name.$extension’,’$descript’)" ;
  
                                  $RES2 = @odbc_exec( $DB, $SQL2 ) ;
   ?>
  
                                  < ?php
  
                                  echo "&lt;script type='text/javascript'&gt;alert('$descript\\n\\n$message\\n\\nUpload: $name\\nSize: $size\\nType: $type\\nStored in: uploads/$name');&lt;/script&gt;" ;
  
   ?>
                                  < ?php
  
                              
  
                          
   ?>
   Select a Video : 
                      
  
  
                      
  
                      &nbsp ;&nbsp ;&nbsp ;&nbsp ;
  
                      
  button_SEND
                      
  
  List of Videos :
  
                              < ?php
                                  //$query = $conn->query("SELECT * FROM videos") ;
                                  $SQL = "SELECT * FROM [dbo].[videos]" ;
                                  $RES = @odbc_exec( $DB, $SQL ) ;
                                  //while($row = $RES->fetch())
                                  while($row = odbc_fetch_array($RES))
                                  $video_id = $row[’video_id’] ;
   ?>
                                  Click to Watch ---> 
  
                                      
  
                                          < ?php
  
                                              echo $row[’title’] ;
  
   ?>
  
                                       
  
                                  
  
                              < ?php include (’video_modal.php’) ; ?>
  
                              < ?php
  
                               
  
   ?>
  
          
  
          
  
  

  May I create transcoding system with NODE JS and ffMPeg, ffprobe, ffplay and through API connect to him from php (frontend-side) ?

• The use cases for a element in HTML

  27 novembre 2012, par silvia

  The W3C HTML WG and the WHATWG are currently discussing the introduction of a <main> element into HTML.

  The <main> element has been proposed by Steve Faulkner and is specified in a draft extension spec which is about to be accepted as a FPWD (first public working draft) by the W3C HTML WG. This implies that the W3C HTML WG will be looking for implementations and for feedback by implementers on this spec.

  I am supportive of the introduction of a <main> element into HTML. However, I believe that the current spec and use case list don’t make a good enough case for its introduction. Here are my thoughts.

  Main use case : accessibility

  In my opinion, the main use case for the introduction of <main> is accessibility.

  Like any other users, when blind users want to perceive a Web page/application, they need to have a quick means of grasping the content of a page. Since they cannot visually scan the layout and thus determine where the main content is, they use accessibility technology (AT) to find what is known as “landmarks”.

  “Landmarks” tell the user what semantic content is on a page : a header (such as a banner), a search box, a navigation menu, some asides (also called complementary content), a footer, …. and the most important part : the main content of the page. It is this main content that a blind user most often wants to skip to directly.

  In the days of HTML4, a hidden “skip to content” link at the beginning of the Web page was used as a means to help blind users access the main content.

  In the days of ARIA, the aria @role=main enables authors to avoid a hidden link and instead mark the element where the main content begins to allow direct access to the main content. This attribute is supported by AT – in particular screen readers – by making it part of the landmarks that AT can directly skip to.

  Both the hidden link and the ARIA @role=main approaches are, however, band aids : they are being used by those of us that make “finished” Web pages accessible by adding specific extra markup.

  A world where ARIA is not necessary and where accessibility developers would be out of a job because the normal markup that everyone writes already creates accessible Web sites/applications would be much preferable over the current world of band-aids.

  Therefore, to me, the primary use case for a <main> element is to achieve exactly this better world and not require specialized markup to tell a user (or a tool) where the main content on a page starts.

  An immediate effect would be that pages that have a <main> element will expose a “main” landmark to blind and vision-impaired users that will enable them to directly access that main content on the page without having to wade through other text on the page. Without a <main> element, this functionality can currently only be provided using heuristics to skip other semantic and structural elements and is for this reason not typically implemented in AT.

  Other use cases

  The <main> element is a semantic element not unlike other new semantic elements such as <header>, <footer>, <aside>, <article>, <nav>, or <section>. Thus, it can also serve other uses where the main content on a Web page/Web application needs to be identified.

  Data mining

  For data mining of Web content, the identification of the main content is one of the key challenges. Many scholarly articles have been published on this topic. This stackoverflow article references and suggests a multitude of approaches, but the accepted answer says “there’s no way to do this that’s guaranteed to work”. This is because Web pages are inherently complex and many <div>, <p>, <iframe> and other elements are used to provide markup for styling, notifications, ads, analytics and other use cases that are necessary to make a Web page complete, but don’t contribute to what a user consumes as semantically rich content. A <main> element will allow authors to pro-actively direct data mining tools to the main content.

  Search engines

  One particularly important “data mining” tool are search engines. They, too, have a hard time to identify which sections of a Web page are more important than others and employ many heuristics to do so, see e.g. this ACM article. Yet, they still disappoint with poor results pointing to findings of keywords in little relevant sections of a page rather than ranking Web pages higher where the keywords turn up in the main content area. A <main> element would be able to help search engines give text in main content areas a higher weight and prefer them over other areas of the Web page. It would be able to rank different Web pages depending on where on the page the search words are found. The <main> element will be an additional hint that search engines will digest.

  Visual focus

  On small devices, the display of Web pages designed for Desktop often causes confusion as to where the main content can be found and read, in particular when the text ends up being too small to be readable. It would be nice if browsers on small devices had a functionality (maybe a default setting) where Web pages would start being displayed as zoomed in on the main content. This could alleviate some of the headaches of responsive Web design, where the recommendation is to show high priority content as the first content. Right now this problem is addressed through stylesheets that re-layout the page differently depending on device, but again this is a band-aid solution. Explicit semantic markup of the main content can solve this problem more elegantly.

  Styling

  Finally, naturally, <main> would also be used to style the main content differently from others. You can e.g. replace a semantically meaningless <div id=”main”> with a semantically meaningful <main> where their position is identical. My analysis below shows, that this is not always the case, since oftentimes <div id=”main”> is used to group everything together that is not the header – in particular where there are multiple columns. Thus, the ease of styling a <main> element is only a positive side effect and not actually a real use case. It does make it easier, however, to adapt the style of the main content e.g. with media queries.

  Proposed alternative solutions

  It has been proposed that existing markup serves to satisfy the use cases that <main> has been proposed for. Let’s analyse these on some of the most popular Web sites. First let’s list the propsed algorithms.

  Proposed solution No 1 : Scooby-Doo

  On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote :
  | The main content is whatever content isn’t
  | marked up as not being main content (anything not marked up with <header>,
  | <aside>, <nav>, etc).
  

  This implies that the first element that is not a <header>, <aside>, <nav>, or <footer> will be the element that we want to give to a blind user as the location where they should start reading. The algorithm is implemented in https://gist.github.com/4032962.

  Proposed solution No 2 : First article element

  On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote :
  | On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Ian Yang wrote :
  | >
  | > That’s a good idea. We really need an element to wrap all the <p>s,
  | > <ul>s, <ol>s, <figure>s, <table>s ... etc of a blog post.
  |
  | That’s called <article>.
  

  This approach identifies the first <article> element on the page as containing the main content. Here’s the algorithm for this approach.

  Proposed solution No 3 : An example heuristic approach

  The readability plugin has been developed to make Web pages readable by essentially removing all the non-main content from a page. An early source of readability is available. This demonstrates what a heuristic approach can perform.

  Analysing alternative solutions

  Comparison

  I’ve picked 4 typical Websites (top on Alexa) to analyse how these three different approaches fare. Ideally, I’d like to simply apply the above three scripts and compare pictures. However, since the semantic HTML5 elements <header>, <aside>, <nav>, and <footer> are not actually used by any of these Web sites, I don’t actually have this choice.

  So, instead, I decided to make some assumptions of where these semantic elements would be used and what the outcome of applying the first two algorithms would be. I can then compare it to the third, which is a product so we can take screenshots.

  Google.com

  http://google.com – search for “Scooby Doo”.

  The search results page would likely be built with :

  • a <nav> menu for the Google bar
  • a <header> for the search bar
  • another <header> for the login section
  • another <nav> menu for the search types
  • a <div> to contain the rest of the page
  • a <div> for the app bar with the search number
  • a few <aside>s for the left and right column
  • a set of <article>s for the search results

  “Scooby Doo” would find the first element after the headers as the “main content”. This is the element before the app bar in this case. Interestingly, there is a <div @id=main> already in the current Google results page, which “Scooby Doo” would likely also pick. However, there are a nav bar and two asides in this div, which clearly should not be part of the “main content”. Google actually placed a @role=main on a different element, namely the one that encapsulates all the search results.

  “First Article” would find the first search result as the “main content”. While not quite the same as what Google intended – namely all search results – it is close enough to be useful.

  The “readability” result is interesting, since it is not able to identify the main text on the page. It is actually aware of this problem and brings a warning before displaying this page :

  

  Facebook.com

  https://facebook.com

  A user page would likely be built with :

  • a <header> bar for the search and login bar
  • a <div> to contain the rest of the page
  • an <aside> for the left column
  • a <div> to contain the center and right column
  • an <aside> for the right column
  • a <header> to contain the center column “megaphone”
  • a <div> for the status posting
  • a set of <article>s for the home stream

  “Scooby Doo” would find the first element after the headers as the “main content”. This is the element that contains all three columns. It’s actually a <div @id=content> already in the current Facebook user page, which “Scooby Doo” would likely also pick. However, Facebook selected a different element to place the @role=main : the center column.

  “First Article” would find the first news item in the home stream. This is clearly not what Facebook intended, since they placed the @role=main on the center column, above the first blog post’s title. “First Article” would miss that title and the status posting.

  The “readability” result again disappoints but warns that it failed :

  

  YouTube.com

  http://youtube.com

  A video page would likely be built with :

  • a <header> bar for the search and login bar
  • a <nav> for the menu
  • a <div> to contain the rest of the page
  • a <header> for the video title and channel links
  • a <div> to contain the video with controls
  • a <div> to contain the center and right column
  • an <aside> for the right column with an <article> per related video
  • an <aside> for the information below the video
  • a <article> per comment below the video

  “Scooby Doo” would find the first element after the headers as the “main content”. This is the element that contains the rest of the page. It’s actually a <div @id=content> already in the current YouTube video page, which “Scooby Doo” would likely also pick. However, YouTube’s related videos and comments are unlikely to be what the user would regard as “main content” – it’s the video they are after, which generously has a <div id=watch-player>.

  “First Article” would find the first related video or comment in the home stream. This is clearly not what YouTube intends.

  The “readability” result is not quite as unusable, but still very bare :

  

  Wikipedia.com

  http://wikipedia.com (“Overscan” page)

  A Wikipedia page would likely be built with :

  • a <header> bar for the search, login and menu items
  • a <div> to contain the rest of the page
  • an &ls; article> with title and lots of text
  • <article> an <aside> with the table of contents
  • several <aside>s for the left column

  Good news : “Scooby Doo” would find the first element after the headers as the “main content”. This is the element that contains the rest of the page. It’s actually a <div id=”content” role=”main”> element on Wikipedia, which “Scooby Doo” would likely also pick.

  “First Article” would find the title and text of the main element on the page, but it would also include an <aside>.

  The “readability” result is also in agreement.

  

  Results

  In the following table we have summarised the results for the experiments :

  Site	Scooby-Doo	First article	Readability
  Google.com	FAIL	SUCCESS	FAIL
  Facebook.com	FAIL	FAIL	FAIL
  YouTube.com	FAIL	FAIL	FAIL
  Wikipedia.com	SUCCESS	SUCCESS	SUCCESS

  Clearly, Wikipedia is the prime example of a site where even the simple approaches find it easy to determine the main content on the page. WordPress blogs are similarly successful. Almost any other site, including news sites, social networks and search engine sites are petty hopeless with the proposed approaches, because there are too many elements that are used for layout or other purposes (notifications, hidden areas) such that the pre-determined list of semantic elements that are available simply don’t suffice to mark up a Web page/application completely.

  Conclusion

  It seems that in general it is impossible to determine which element(s) on a Web page should be the “main” piece of content that accessibility tools jump to when requested, that a search engine should put their focus on, or that should be highlighted to a general user to read. It would be very useful if the author of the Web page would provide a hint through a <main> element where that main content is to be found.

  I think that the <main> element becomes particularly useful when combined with a default keyboard shortcut in browsers as proposed by Steve : we may actually find that non-accessibility users will also start making use of this shortcut, e.g. to get to videos on YouTube pages directly without having to tab over search boxes and other interactive elements, etc. Worthwhile markup indeed.